From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos4212: hotplug: Fix CPU idle clock down after CPU1 off
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:46:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401453990.11651.2.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53887095.7090108@gmail.com>
On pią, 2014-05-30 at 13:50 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 13.05.2014 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Exynos4212 USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION must be set in
> > ARM_CORE1_OPTION register during CPU power down. This is the proper way
> > of powering down CPU. Additionally without this the CPU clock down won't
> > work after powering down CPU1 and CPU will work at full frequency chosen
> > by CPUfreq governor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > index 5eead530c6f8..59b813e74558 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> > dsb();
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
> > +static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > unsigned int v;
> >
> > @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@ static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
> > : "=&r" (v)
> > : "Ir" (CR_C), "Ir" (0x40)
> > : "cc");
> > +
> > + if (cpu == 1 && soc_is_exynos4212()) {
>
> AFAIK this is needed not only on Exynos4x12, but at least also on 4412.
> Also I don't think the (cpu == 1) condition is necessary. See below.
I'll test it on Exynos4412.
>
> > + unsigned int tmp;
> > +
> > + tmp = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
> > + tmp &= ~(S5P_USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION);
> > + __raw_writel(tmp, S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> > @@ -95,8 +103,22 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> > for (;;) {
> >
> > /* make cpu1 to be turned off at next WFI command */
> > - if (cpu == 1)
> > + if (cpu == 1) {
>
> I think this patch should be rebased on top of my "[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS:
> Fix core ID used by platsmp and hotplug code". Then instead of if (cpu
> == 1) you would just use EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id).
>
> Also same comment as above, I believe this is also needed on Exynos4412.
Probably your patch needs rebasing too. I couldn't apply (cleanly) on
current Linus' tree and on Kukjin's for-next. What are the requirements
for it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: exynos4212: hotplug: Fix CPU idle clock down after CPU1 off
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:46:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401453990.11651.2.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53887095.7090108@gmail.com>
On pi?, 2014-05-30 at 13:50 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 13.05.2014 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Exynos4212 USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION must be set in
> > ARM_CORE1_OPTION register during CPU power down. This is the proper way
> > of powering down CPU. Additionally without this the CPU clock down won't
> > work after powering down CPU1 and CPU will work at full frequency chosen
> > by CPUfreq governor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > index 5eead530c6f8..59b813e74558 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> > dsb();
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
> > +static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > unsigned int v;
> >
> > @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@ static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
> > : "=&r" (v)
> > : "Ir" (CR_C), "Ir" (0x40)
> > : "cc");
> > +
> > + if (cpu == 1 && soc_is_exynos4212()) {
>
> AFAIK this is needed not only on Exynos4x12, but at least also on 4412.
> Also I don't think the (cpu == 1) condition is necessary. See below.
I'll test it on Exynos4412.
>
> > + unsigned int tmp;
> > +
> > + tmp = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
> > + tmp &= ~(S5P_USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION);
> > + __raw_writel(tmp, S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> > @@ -95,8 +103,22 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> > for (;;) {
> >
> > /* make cpu1 to be turned off at next WFI command */
> > - if (cpu == 1)
> > + if (cpu == 1) {
>
> I think this patch should be rebased on top of my "[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS:
> Fix core ID used by platsmp and hotplug code". Then instead of if (cpu
> == 1) you would just use EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id).
>
> Also same comment as above, I believe this is also needed on Exynos4412.
Probably your patch needs rebasing too. I couldn't apply (cleanly) on
current Linus' tree and on Kukjin's for-next. What are the requirements
for it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 14:12 [PATCH] ARM: exynos4212: hotplug: Fix CPU idle clock down after CPU1 off Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-05-13 14:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-05-30 11:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-05-30 11:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-05-30 11:50 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-30 11:50 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-30 12:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2014-05-30 12:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-05-30 12:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-30 12:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-30 14:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-05-30 14:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1401453990.11651.2.camel@AMDC1943 \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.