From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, waiman.long@hp.com,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave.anglin@bell.net, aswin@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:13:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402074788.6680.50.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402070140-15090-2-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 08:55 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Just like with mutexes (CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER),
> encapsulate the dependencies for rwsem optimistic spinning.
> No logical changes here as it continues to depend on both
> SMP and the XADD algorithm variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rwsem.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/Kconfig.locks | 4 ++++
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Do we also want to add an #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER in
__init_rwsem() and in the optimistic spinning functions for rwsem-xadd?
Besides that:
Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 15:55 [PATCH 0/2] locking/rwsem: disable optimistic spinning for PA-RISC Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 17:13 ` Jason Low [this message]
2014-06-06 18:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 18:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 19:08 ` Jason Low
2014-06-06 19:20 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] locking/rwsem: Disable optimistic spinning for PA-RISC Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 17:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2014-06-06 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-06 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 17:57 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 17:58 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-16 19:24 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-17 11:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-17 11:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-18 3:07 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-18 3:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402074788.6680.50.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.