Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional scanning

[Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:55:02 +0800 Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index a8ffe4e..2c35e34 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2087,8 +2086,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> >  	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> >  	while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
> >  					nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) {
> > -		unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, percentage;
> > -		unsigned long nr_scanned;
> > +		unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, file_percent, anon_percent;
> > +		unsigned long nr_to_scan, nr_scanned, percentage;
> >  
> >  		for_each_evictable_lru(lru) {
> >  			if (nr[lru]) {
> 
> The increased stack use is a slight concern - we can be very deep here.
> I suspect the "percent" locals are more for convenience/clarity, and
> they could be eliminated (in a separate patch) at some cost of clarity?
> 
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a8ffe4e..2c35e34 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2057,8 +2057,7 @@ out:
 static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control
*sc)
 {
        unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
-       unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
-       unsigned long nr_to_scan;
+       unsigned long file_target, anon_target;

>From the above snippet, we can know that the "percent" locals come from
targets[NR_LRU_LISTS]. So this fix does not increase the stack.

thx!
cyc


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>