From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Joshua Whitehead <josh.whitehead@dornerworks.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Nate Studer <nate.studer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Implement cbs algorithm, remove extra queues, latency scaling, and weight support from sedf
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:19:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403921959.8515.127.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53AC7FF0.2080206@dornerworks.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1583 bytes --]
On gio, 2014-06-26 at 16:17 -0400, Joshua Whitehead wrote:
> On 6/17/2014 11:43 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > As I said, it's very hard to review the patch like this... Let me know
> > if you agree in splitting it, in which case, I'd rather have a look at
> > that version when it'll be ready.
> >
> Yes I think splitting (as well as some of the other reorganization mentioned
> elsewhere) would be best and make it easier to review. Some of the above would
> also depend on how we decided to handle the input from George as it sounds like
> he doesn't feel it would cause much of an issue to change the parameters around.
> I can't promise anything as we have other projects going on concurrently, but
> maybe we'll shoot to have a reorganized and cleaned up V2 out by next week.
>
Saying it once more, that would be great.
As per the renaming/removing, I'd say, for v2, do as George said. Change
in place, rename and remove the list (nothing?), at least from the
interface, and change the behavior whenever required.
Also, make sure you comply with the API stability requirement, at the
libxl level, as suggested also by George, by means of the proper
LIBXL_HAVE_xxx and/or LIBXL_API_VERSION_xxx macros.
There are usage examples of both, in libxl sources.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-28 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-13 19:58 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time use Josh Whitehead
2014-06-13 19:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] Implement cbs algorithm, remove extra queues, latency scaling, and weight support from sedf Josh Whitehead
2014-06-17 15:43 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-26 20:17 ` Joshua Whitehead
2014-06-28 2:19 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2014-06-17 16:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-26 20:18 ` Joshua Whitehead
2014-06-28 2:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-13 19:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] Add cbs parameter support to xl tool stack, remove defunct sedf parameters Josh Whitehead
2014-06-17 15:02 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-26 19:55 ` Joshua Whitehead
2014-06-13 19:58 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] Updated comments/variables to reflect cbs, fixed formatting and confusing comments/variables Josh Whitehead
2014-06-16 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-16 15:29 ` George Dunlap
2014-06-17 16:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-17 17:28 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-25 20:13 ` Meng Xu
2014-06-26 21:24 ` Joshua Whitehead
2014-06-28 2:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-18 11:18 ` George Dunlap
2014-06-26 21:30 ` Joshua Whitehead
2014-06-26 21:23 ` Joshua Whitehead
2014-06-28 2:09 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-13 19:58 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] Changed filenames with sedf to cbs to reflect the actual scheduler Josh Whitehead
2014-06-16 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time use Dario Faggioli
2014-06-17 14:44 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-26 19:53 ` Joshua Whitehead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403921959.8515.127.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=josh.whitehead@dornerworks.com \
--cc=nate.studer@gmail.com \
--cc=robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.