From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: Don't hide spin_lock in swap_info_get internal
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:13:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404260029-11525-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404260029-11525-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
Now, swap_info_get hides lock holding by doing it internally
but releasing the lock so caller should release the lock.
Normally, it's not a good pattern and I need to handle lock
from caller in next patchset.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 8798b2e0ac59..ec2ce926ea5f 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -740,7 +740,6 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info_get(swp_entry_t entry)
goto bad_offset;
if (!p->swap_map[offset])
goto bad_free;
- spin_lock(&p->lock);
return p;
bad_free:
@@ -835,6 +834,7 @@ void swap_free(swp_entry_t entry)
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
swap_entry_free(p, entry, 1);
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
@@ -849,6 +849,7 @@ void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
swap_entry_free(p, entry, SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
@@ -868,6 +869,7 @@ int page_swapcount(struct page *page)
entry.val = page_private(page);
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
count = swap_count(p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)]);
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
@@ -950,6 +952,7 @@ int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
if (swap_entry_free(p, entry, 1) == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(entry),
entry.val);
@@ -2763,6 +2766,7 @@ int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask)
goto outer;
}
+ spin_lock(&si->lock);
offset = swp_offset(entry);
count = si->swap_map[offset] & ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: Don't hide spin_lock in swap_info_get internal
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:13:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404260029-11525-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404260029-11525-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
Now, swap_info_get hides lock holding by doing it internally
but releasing the lock so caller should release the lock.
Normally, it's not a good pattern and I need to handle lock
from caller in next patchset.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 8798b2e0ac59..ec2ce926ea5f 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -740,7 +740,6 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info_get(swp_entry_t entry)
goto bad_offset;
if (!p->swap_map[offset])
goto bad_free;
- spin_lock(&p->lock);
return p;
bad_free:
@@ -835,6 +834,7 @@ void swap_free(swp_entry_t entry)
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
swap_entry_free(p, entry, 1);
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
@@ -849,6 +849,7 @@ void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
swap_entry_free(p, entry, SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
@@ -868,6 +869,7 @@ int page_swapcount(struct page *page)
entry.val = page_private(page);
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
count = swap_count(p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)]);
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}
@@ -950,6 +952,7 @@ int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
p = swap_info_get(entry);
if (p) {
+ spin_lock(&p->lock);
if (swap_entry_free(p, entry, 1) == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(entry),
entry.val);
@@ -2763,6 +2766,7 @@ int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask)
goto outer;
}
+ spin_lock(&si->lock);
offset = swp_offset(entry);
count = si->swap_map[offset] & ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
--
2.0.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 0:13 [PATCH v3 0/3] free reclaimed pages by paging out instantly Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 0:13 ` Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 0:13 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2014-07-02 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: Don't hide spin_lock in swap_info_get internal Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm: Introduce atomic_remove_mapping Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 0:13 ` Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: Free reclaimed pages indepdent of next reclaim Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 0:13 ` Minchan Kim
2014-07-02 20:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] free reclaimed pages by paging out instantly Andrew Morton
2014-07-02 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-03 0:59 ` Minchan Kim
2014-07-03 0:59 ` Minchan Kim
2014-07-07 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-07 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1404260029-11525-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.