Re: Introduce rt real-time scheduler for Xen

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1447 bytes --]

On ven, 2014-07-11 at 11:50 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:49:54AM -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> [...]
> > 
> > [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rt: Add rt scheduler to hypervisor
> > [PATCH RFC v1 2/4] xl for rt scheduler
> > [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] libxl for rt scheduler
> > [PATCH RFC v1 4/4] libxc for rt scheduler
> > 
> 
> I have some general comments on how you arrange these patches.
> 
> At a glance of the title and code you should do them in the order of 1,
> 4, 3 and 2. Apparently xl depends on libxl, libxl depends on libxc, and
> libxc depends on hypervisor. You will break bisection with current
> ordering.
> 
Yep, I agree with Wei.

> And we normally write titles like
>   xen: add rt scheduler
>   libxl: introduce rt scheduler
>   xl: XXXX
>   etc.
> start with component name and separate with colon.
> 
Indeed we do, and this helps quite a bit.

> Last but not least, you need to CC relevant maintainers. You can find
> out maintainers with scripts/get_maintainers.pl.
> 
Yes, but this one, Meng almost got it right, I think.

Basically, Meng, you're missing hypervisors maintainers (at least for
patch 1). :-)

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel