From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, xisisu@gmail.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
xumengpanda@gmail.com, lichong659@gmail.com,
dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] libxl for rt scheduler
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:08:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405091329.29306.464.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405054198-29106-4-git-send-email-mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2218 bytes --]
On ven, 2014-07-11 at 00:49 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +static int sched_rt_domain_get(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> + libxl_domain_sched_params *scinfo)
> +{
> + struct xen_domctl_sched_rt_params sdom;
> + int rc, i;
> +
> + rc = xc_sched_rt_domain_get(CTX->xch, domid, &sdom);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + LOGE(ERROR, "getting domain sched rt");
> + return ERROR_FAIL;
> + }
> +
> + libxl_domain_sched_params_init(scinfo);
> + scinfo->sched = LIBXL_SCHEDULER_RT;
> + scinfo->rt.max_vcpus = LIBXL_XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS;
> + /*TODO: alloc array with exact num of dom's vcpus; and use GCNEW_ARRAY()*/
>
Indeed. That, or just do an hypercall for each VCPU, at least as a first
step.
> + scinfo->rt.vcpus = (libxl_vcpu *)
> + malloc( sizeof(libxl_vcpu) * scinfo->rt.max_vcpus );
>
Yes, you said it yourself, I see: GCNEW_ARRAY() and no malloc() in
libxl.
> + if ( !scinfo->rt.vcpus ){
> + LOGE(ERROR, "Allocate lib_vcpu array fails\n");
> + return ERROR_INVAL;
> + }
> + scinfo->rt.num_vcpus = sdom.num_vcpus;
> + for( i = 0; i < sdom.num_vcpus; ++i)
> + {
> + scinfo->rt.vcpus[i].period = sdom.vcpus[i].period;
> + scinfo->rt.vcpus[i].budget = sdom.vcpus[i].budget;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define SCHED_RT_VCPU_PARAMS_MAX 4294967295 /* 2^32-1 */
> +
I don't like the name. I'd go for something like
SCHED_RT_VCPU_PERIOD_MAX and SCHED_RT_VCPU_BUDGET_MAX.
You well can define both to the same value, of course.
As per the value, yes, even if we turn the interface in usecs, 2^32
usecs is still ~4000 secs, which ought to be enough as a period or
budget for everyone! :-)
For the rest of this file, I think I'll wait for v2, as the interface is
subject to be changed.
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 4:49 Introduce rt real-time scheduler for Xen Meng Xu
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rt: Add rt scheduler to hypervisor Meng Xu
2014-07-11 14:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 14:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-11 15:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 15:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-11 15:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-16 17:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-17 10:12 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-17 15:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-18 5:46 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-18 18:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/4] xl for rt scheduler Meng Xu
2014-07-11 11:02 ` Wei Liu
2014-07-11 14:59 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 15:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:25 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-13 12:58 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-14 7:40 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-14 9:31 ` Wei Liu
2014-07-17 15:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] libxl " Meng Xu
2014-07-11 11:05 ` Wei Liu
2014-07-11 15:08 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2014-07-12 18:16 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-14 10:38 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-17 15:34 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-17 15:36 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-18 11:05 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/4] libxc " Meng Xu
2014-07-11 14:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:23 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 16:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-12 19:46 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-17 15:29 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-17 15:34 ` George Dunlap
2014-07-17 22:16 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-18 9:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-18 9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-18 12:11 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-18 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-18 10:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 10:50 ` Introduce rt real-time scheduler for Xen Wei Liu
2014-07-11 11:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-11 16:14 ` Meng Xu
2014-07-11 16:19 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405091329.29306.464.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=lichong659@gmail.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=xisisu@gmail.com \
--cc=xumengpanda@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.