From: msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: make CONFIG_ZONE_DMA user settable
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:56:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405979809.25580.133.camel@deneb.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718110718.GC19850@arm.com>
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 12:07 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 15:14 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:17:03PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 12:09 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > > My proposal (in the absence of any kind of description) is to still
> > > > > create a ZONE_DMA if we have DMA memory below 32-bit, otherwise just add
> > > > > everything (>32-bit) to ZONE_DMA. Basically an extension from your CMA
> > > > > patch, make dma_phys_limit static in that file and set it to
> > > > > memblock_end_of_DRAM() if no 32-bit DMA. Re-use it in the
> > > > > zone_sizes_init() function for ZONE_DMA (maybe with a pr_info for no
> > > > > 32-bit only DMA zone).
> > > >
> > > > There's a performance issue with all memory being in ZONE_DMA. It means
> > > > all normal allocations will fail on ZONE_NORMAL and then have to fall
> > > > back to ZONE_DMA. It would be better to put some percentage of memory
> > > > in ZONE_DMA.
> > >
> > > Is the performance penalty real or just theoretical? I haven't run any
> > > benchmarks myself.
> >
> > It is real insofar as you must eat cycles eliminating ZONE_NORMAL from
> > consideration in the page allocation hot path. How much that really
> > costs, I don't know. But it seems like it could be easily avoided by
> > limiting ZONE_DMA size. Is there any reason it needs to be larger than
> > 4GiB?
>
> Basically ZONE_DMA should allow a 32-bit dma mask. When memory starts
> above 4G, in the absence of an IOMMU, it is likely that 32-bit devices
> get some offset for the top bits to be able to address the bottom of the
> memory. The problem is that dma_to_phys() that early in the kernel has
> no idea about DMA offsets until later (they can be specified in DT per
> device).
>
> The patch belows tries to guess a DMA offset and use the bottom 32-bit
> of the DRAM as ZONE_DMA.
>
> -------8<-----------------------
>
> From 133656f8378dbb838ad5f12ea29aa9303d7ca922 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:54:37 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Create non-empty ZONE_DMA when DRAM starts above 4GB
>
> ZONE_DMA is created to allow 32-bit only devices to access memory in the
> absence of an IOMMU. On systems where the memory starts above 4GB, it is
> expected that some devices have a DMA offset hardwired to be able to
> access the bottom of the memory. Linux currently supports DT bindings
> for the DMA offsets but they are not (easily) available early during
> boot.
>
> This patch tries to guess a DMA offset and assumes that ZONE_DMA
> corresponds to the 32-bit mask above the start of DRAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> ---
Tested-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Thanks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: make CONFIG_ZONE_DMA user settable
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:56:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405979809.25580.133.camel@deneb.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718110718.GC19850@arm.com>
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 12:07 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 15:14 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:17:03PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 12:09 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > > My proposal (in the absence of any kind of description) is to still
> > > > > create a ZONE_DMA if we have DMA memory below 32-bit, otherwise just add
> > > > > everything (>32-bit) to ZONE_DMA. Basically an extension from your CMA
> > > > > patch, make dma_phys_limit static in that file and set it to
> > > > > memblock_end_of_DRAM() if no 32-bit DMA. Re-use it in the
> > > > > zone_sizes_init() function for ZONE_DMA (maybe with a pr_info for no
> > > > > 32-bit only DMA zone).
> > > >
> > > > There's a performance issue with all memory being in ZONE_DMA. It means
> > > > all normal allocations will fail on ZONE_NORMAL and then have to fall
> > > > back to ZONE_DMA. It would be better to put some percentage of memory
> > > > in ZONE_DMA.
> > >
> > > Is the performance penalty real or just theoretical? I haven't run any
> > > benchmarks myself.
> >
> > It is real insofar as you must eat cycles eliminating ZONE_NORMAL from
> > consideration in the page allocation hot path. How much that really
> > costs, I don't know. But it seems like it could be easily avoided by
> > limiting ZONE_DMA size. Is there any reason it needs to be larger than
> > 4GiB?
>
> Basically ZONE_DMA should allow a 32-bit dma mask. When memory starts
> above 4G, in the absence of an IOMMU, it is likely that 32-bit devices
> get some offset for the top bits to be able to address the bottom of the
> memory. The problem is that dma_to_phys() that early in the kernel has
> no idea about DMA offsets until later (they can be specified in DT per
> device).
>
> The patch belows tries to guess a DMA offset and use the bottom 32-bit
> of the DRAM as ZONE_DMA.
>
> -------8<-----------------------
>
> From 133656f8378dbb838ad5f12ea29aa9303d7ca922 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:54:37 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Create non-empty ZONE_DMA when DRAM starts above 4GB
>
> ZONE_DMA is created to allow 32-bit only devices to access memory in the
> absence of an IOMMU. On systems where the memory starts above 4GB, it is
> expected that some devices have a DMA offset hardwired to be able to
> access the bottom of the memory. Linux currently supports DT bindings
> for the DMA offsets but they are not (easily) available early during
> boot.
>
> This patch tries to guess a DMA offset and assumes that ZONE_DMA
> corresponds to the 32-bit mask above the start of DRAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> ---
Tested-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 5:05 [PATCH] arm64: make CONFIG_ZONE_DMA user settable Mark Salter
2014-06-23 5:05 ` Mark Salter
2014-06-23 9:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 9:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-23 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-23 13:17 ` Mark Salter
2014-06-23 13:17 ` Mark Salter
2014-06-24 14:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-24 14:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-24 14:38 ` Mark Salter
2014-06-24 14:38 ` Mark Salter
2014-07-18 11:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 11:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 11:58 ` Anup Patel
2014-07-18 11:58 ` Anup Patel
2014-07-18 14:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18 14:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-21 21:56 ` Mark Salter [this message]
2014-07-21 21:56 ` Mark Salter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405979809.25580.133.camel@deneb.redhat.com \
--to=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.