All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: Should I be worried about this nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host warning while building meta-toolchain
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:35:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406887.iQETxedpIY@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFZh4h_PG+MAFjgyq-RyTRs-NX9DqJ46hggBqbrN8m1K=J-bog@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 23 July 2013 13:23:46 Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Paul Eggleton <
> paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> > 
> > Did you perhaps build meta-toolchain and then change MACHINE and build it
> > again? What happened prior to this build?
> > 
> > 
> > I ran bitbake meta-toolchain and when that was complete I edited my
> 
> local.conf and uncommented the following line so I would get a 32 bit
> toolchain:
> SDKMACHINE ?= "i686"
> 
> ... and then I ran bitbake meta-toolchain again and that is when the
> messages appeared that I copied in the OP.

OK, so I can see what's happening here. The package name does not change 
depending on what SDKMACHINE is set to and thus it sees two "different" writes 
to the same file.

I'd need to verify in the case of where you switched back and rebuilt meta-
toolchain again for x86-64, but I think in this instance you'll find that it 
isn't a problem since it should build (or restore from shared state) the 
appropriate version of  nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-23 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-23 14:13 Should I be worried about this nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host warning while building meta-toolchain Brian Hutchinson
2013-07-23 15:13 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-23 15:34   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-07-23 15:56     ` Brian Hutchinson
2013-07-23 17:18     ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-23 22:01     ` Christian Gagneraud
2013-10-29 20:47       ` Brian Hutchinson
2013-07-23 17:19 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-23 17:23   ` Brian Hutchinson
2013-07-23 17:35     ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-07-23 17:44       ` Khem Raj
2013-07-23 17:31 ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406887.iQETxedpIY@helios \
    --to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=b.hutchman@gmail.com \
    --cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.