All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@amd.com>,
	"Christian Koenig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: TTM placement & caching issue/questions
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:25:23 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409797523.25089.8.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140904020742.GC4835@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:07 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:

> So in the meantime the attached patch should work, it just silently ignore
> the caching attribute request on non x86 instead of pretending that things
> are setup as expected and then latter the radeon ou nouveau hw unsetting
> the snoop bit.
> 
> It's not tested but i think it should work.

I'm still getting placements with !CACHED going from bo_memcpy in
ttm_io_prot() though ... I'm looking at filtering the placement
attributes instead.

Ben.

> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Jérôme
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ben.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@amd.com>,
	"Christian Koenig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: TTM placement & caching issue/questions
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:25:23 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409797523.25089.8.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140904020742.GC4835@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:07 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:

> So in the meantime the attached patch should work, it just silently ignore
> the caching attribute request on non x86 instead of pretending that things
> are setup as expected and then latter the radeon ou nouveau hw unsetting
> the snoop bit.
> 
> It's not tested but i think it should work.

I'm still getting placements with !CACHED going from bo_memcpy in
ttm_io_prot() though ... I'm looking at filtering the placement
attributes instead.

Ben.

> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Jérôme
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ben.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-04  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-04  0:12 TTM placement & caching issue/questions Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  0:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  1:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:07   ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:07     ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:25     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2014-09-04  2:25       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  2:31       ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:31         ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:32         ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:32           ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:36         ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  2:36           ` Jerome Glisse
2014-09-04  5:23           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  6:45           ` Gabriel Paubert
2014-09-04  7:19           ` Michel Dänzer
2014-09-04  7:54             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  7:59               ` Michel Dänzer
2014-09-04  7:59                 ` Michel Dänzer
2014-09-04  8:07                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  2:15   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  7:12   ` Michel Dänzer
2014-09-04  7:44 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-04  7:44   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-04  8:06   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  8:46     ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-04  8:46       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-04  9:34   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-04  9:34     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-04  9:43     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04 10:23       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-04 10:23         ` Thomas Hellstrom
     [not found] <ED4D93630842CD4385F644DC5158EE9171B05E72@NTOVMAIL03.ad.otto.de>
2014-09-05  7:40 ` Jochen Rollwagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1409797523.25089.8.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=j.glisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michel.daenzer@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.