From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/7] ARM: at91: introduce basic SAMA5D4 support
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:47:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1411732023.7866.15.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410797759-18675-3-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 18:15 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
This landed in next-20140926, as commit 2dc850b62e5b ("ARM: at91:
introduce basic SAMA5D4 support").
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index b11ad54f8d17..7b44db208f10 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ choice
> bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263 and 9g45"
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU1
>
> + config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2
> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d4"
> + depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU2
> +
Why is this Kconfig symbol needed? Nothing in next-20140926 uses it. Are
future users perhaps queued somewhere (say, in commits that didn't
survive today's rather lively linux-next merges)?
> config DEBUG_BCM2835
> bool "Kernel low-level debugging on BCM2835 PL011 UART"
> depends on ARCH_BCM2835
Paul Bolle
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/7] ARM: at91: introduce basic SAMA5D4 support
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:47:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1411732023.7866.15.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410797759-18675-3-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 18:15 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
This landed in next-20140926, as commit 2dc850b62e5b ("ARM: at91:
introduce basic SAMA5D4 support").
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index b11ad54f8d17..7b44db208f10 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ choice
> bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263 and 9g45"
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU1
>
> + config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2
> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d4"
> + depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU2
> +
Why is this Kconfig symbol needed? Nothing in next-20140926 uses it. Are
future users perhaps queued somewhere (say, in commits that didn't
survive today's rather lively linux-next merges)?
> config DEBUG_BCM2835
> bool "Kernel low-level debugging on BCM2835 PL011 UART"
> depends on ARCH_BCM2835
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-15 16:15 [PATCHv3 0/7] Initial support for the Atmel SMART sama5d4 Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 1/7] clk: at91: add a driver for the h32mx clock Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-19 12:33 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-19 12:33 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-22 9:04 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-22 9:04 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-27 23:01 ` Mike Turquette
2014-09-27 23:01 ` Mike Turquette
2014-09-22 8:51 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-22 8:51 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 2/7] ARM: at91: introduce basic SAMA5D4 support Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-26 11:47 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-09-26 11:47 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-26 14:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-26 14:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-26 14:54 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-26 14:54 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 3/7] ARM: at91: SAMA5D4 SoC detection code and low level routines Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 4/7] ARM: at91: dt: add device tree file for SAMA5D4 SoC Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 5/7] ARM: at91: dt: add device tree file for SAMA5D4ek board Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-19 12:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-19 12:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 6/7] ARM: at91: add sama5d4 support to sama5_defconfig Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 7/7] ARM: at91: document Atmel SMART compatibles Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-15 16:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-19 12:38 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-19 12:38 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1411732023.7866.15.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.