* [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
@ 2014-11-05 19:02 xen.org
2014-11-06 11:31 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: xen.org @ 2014-11-05 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: ian.jackson
flight 31385 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31385/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 30594
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-i386-i386-pv 5 xen-boot fail pass in 31335
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail pass in 31335
test-i386-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail pass in 31288
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail in 31335 pass in 31385
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install fail in 31288 pass in 31385
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 31288 pass in 31385
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail in 31288 pass in 31385
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-i386-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 7 debian-hvm-install fail never pass
test-i386-i386-libvirt 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 7 debian-hvm-install fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
build-i386-rumpuserxen 5 rumpuserxen-build fail never pass
build-amd64-rumpuserxen 5 rumpuserxen-build fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 17 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 17 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen c844974caf1501b6527533ab2a3d27ea8920ab90
baseline version:
xen fad105dd0ac1a224d91757afee01acd4566f7e82
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
build-amd64-rumpuserxen fail
build-i386-rumpuserxen fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-i386-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-freebsd10-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-freebsd10-i386 pass
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 blocked
test-i386-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt fail
test-amd64-i386-libvirt fail
test-i386-i386-libvirt fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-i386-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-i386-i386-pv fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit c844974caf1501b6527533ab2a3d27ea8920ab90
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:23:17 2014 +0100
x86/paging: make log-dirty operations preemptible
Both the freeing and the inspection of the bitmap get done in (nested)
loops which - besides having a rather high iteration count in general,
albeit that would be covered by XSA-77 - have the number of non-trivial
iterations they need to perform (indirectly) controllable by both the
guest they are for and any domain controlling the guest (including the
one running qemu for it).
Note that the tying of the continuations to the invoking domain (which
previously [wrongly] used the invoking vCPU instead) implies that the
tools requesting such operations have to make sure they don't issue
multiple similar operations in parallel.
Note further that this breaks supervisor-mode kernel assumptions in
hypercall_create_continuation() (where regs->eip gets rewound to the
current hypercall stub beginning), but otoh
hypercall_cancel_continuation() doesn't work in that mode either.
Perhaps time to rip out all the remains of that feature?
This is part of CVE-2014-5146 / XSA-97.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Tested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
master commit: 070493dfd2788e061b53f074b7ba97507fbcbf65
master date: 2014-10-06 11:22:04 +0200
(qemu changes not included)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-05 19:02 [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL xen.org
@ 2014-11-06 11:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-06 11:51 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-11-06 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ian.jackson; +Cc: xen-devel
>>> On 05.11.14 at 20:02, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> flight 31385 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31385/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 30594
Ian,
so this continues to be a result of swiotlb issues on the source host.
Iirc you had indicated you took care of this - did that perhaps only
affect -unstable?
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-06 11:31 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-11-06 11:51 ` Ian Jackson
2014-11-07 9:40 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2014-11-06 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL"):
> so this continues to be a result of swiotlb issues on the source host.
> Iirc you had indicated you took care of this - did that perhaps only
> affect -unstable?
My change to the host property in the osstest hostdb didn't have the
intended effect (or, any relevant effect). I'm fixing this but it
will involve a change to osstest.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-06 11:51 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2014-11-07 9:40 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-07 11:31 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-11-07 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Jackson; +Cc: xen-devel, Jan Beulich
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:51 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL"):
> > so this continues to be a result of swiotlb issues on the source host.
> > Iirc you had indicated you took care of this - did that perhaps only
> > affect -unstable?
>
> My change to the host property in the osstest hostdb didn't have the
> intended effect (or, any relevant effect). I'm fixing this but it
> will involve a change to osstest.
FYI judging from
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31393/test-amd64-i386-pair/info.html
scape-moth (and presumably worm-moth) suffer from this issue too:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31393/test-amd64-i386-pair/serial-scape-moth.log
Nov 6 04:20:06.066637 [ 1117.222426] sd 4:1:0:0: pci_map_sg failed: request for 8192 bytes!
Nov 6 04:20:06.066686 [ 1117.240332] mpt2sas 0000:05:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full
Nov 6 04:20:06.086629 [ 1117.240345] sd 4:1:0:0: pci_map_sg failed: request for 8192 bytes!
Nov 6 04:20:06.086680 [ 1117.258331] mpt2sas 0000:05:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-07 9:40 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-11-07 11:31 ` Ian Jackson
2014-11-10 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2014-11-07 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, Jan Beulich
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL"):
> On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:51 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > My change to the host property in the osstest hostdb didn't have the
> > intended effect (or, any relevant effect). I'm fixing this but it
> > will involve a change to osstest.
>
> FYI judging from
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31393/test-amd64-i386-pair/info.html
> scape-moth (and presumably worm-moth) suffer from this issue too:
Hrm. I have added the relevant host property to the moths too. My
osstest change got a push so results should soon start to include the
`swiotlb=26422'.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-07 11:31 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2014-11-10 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-10 14:00 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-11-10 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Jackson; +Cc: xen-devel, Jan Beulich
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 11:31 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL"):
> > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:51 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > My change to the host property in the osstest hostdb didn't have the
> > > intended effect (or, any relevant effect). I'm fixing this but it
> > > will involve a change to osstest.
> >
> > FYI judging from
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31393/test-amd64-i386-pair/info.html
> > scape-moth (and presumably worm-moth) suffer from this issue too:
>
> Hrm. I have added the relevant host property to the moths too. My
> osstest change got a push so results should soon start to include the
> `swiotlb=26422'.
Looks like things are still failing even with this? :-/
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-10 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-11-10 14:00 ` Ian Jackson
2014-11-10 14:08 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2014-11-10 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, Jan Beulich
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL"):
> On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 11:31 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Hrm. I have added the relevant host property to the moths too. My
> > osstest change got a push so results should soon start to include the
> > `swiotlb=26422'.
>
> Looks like things are still failing even with this? :-/
>From serial-worm-moth.log:
Nov 5 14:10:40.550597 [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: placeholder
root=/dev/mapper/worm--moth-root ro BOOTIF=01-78-2b-cb-73-42-c2
console=hvc0^M
Nov 5 14:10:40.578640 [ 0.000000] software IO TLB [mem
0x1ba93000-0x1fa93000] (64MB) mapped at [dba93000-dfa92fff]^M
So the workaround still hasn't taken. This is because we hadn't had a
push of osstest at the time that report was made. Looking at the
database the first non-osstest-self-pushgate flight with the new
osstest was 31432.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL
2014-11-10 14:00 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2014-11-10 14:08 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-11-10 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Jackson; +Cc: xen-devel, Jan Beulich
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 14:00 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL"):
> > On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 11:31 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Hrm. I have added the relevant host property to the moths too. My
> > > osstest change got a push so results should soon start to include the
> > > `swiotlb=26422'.
> >
> > Looks like things are still failing even with this? :-/
>
> From serial-worm-moth.log:
>
> Nov 5 14:10:40.550597 [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: placeholder
> root=/dev/mapper/worm--moth-root ro BOOTIF=01-78-2b-cb-73-42-c2
> console=hvc0^M
>
> Nov 5 14:10:40.578640 [ 0.000000] software IO TLB [mem
> 0x1ba93000-0x1fa93000] (64MB) mapped at [dba93000-dfa92fff]^M
>
> So the workaround still hasn't taken. This is because we hadn't had a
> push of osstest at the time that report was made. Looking at the
> database the first non-osstest-self-pushgate flight with the new
> osstest was 31432.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31458/test-amd64-i386-pair/info.html seems to have the swiotlb= and has failed with
Nov 10 04:12:11.050621 [ 985.934464] sd 4:1:0:0: pci_map_sg failed: request for 4096 bytes!
Nov 10 04:12:11.050678 [ 985.952455] mpt2sas 0000:05:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full
on scape-moth.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-10 14:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-05 19:02 [xen-4.2-testing test] 31385: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2014-11-06 11:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-06 11:51 ` Ian Jackson
2014-11-07 9:40 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-07 11:31 ` Ian Jackson
2014-11-10 13:10 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-10 14:00 ` Ian Jackson
2014-11-10 14:08 ` Ian Campbell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.