From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [ftrace] fef5aeeee9e: -27.2% boot-slabinfo.num_objs
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:28:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1419820095.26403.77.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141223083214.0b199465@gandalf.local.home>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2927 bytes --]
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 08:32 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 11:10:17 +0800
> Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > commit fef5aeeee9e3717e7aea991a7ae9ff6a7a2d4c85 ("ftrace: Replace tramp_hash with old_*_hash to save space")
> >
> >
> > testbox/testcase/testparams: vm-kbuild-4G/boot/1
> >
> > e1effa0144a1ddf5 fef5aeeee9e3717e7aea991a7a
> > ---------------- --------------------------
> > %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \
> > 437752 ± 0% -27.2% 318545 ± 0% boot-slabinfo.num_objs
> >
> > vm-kbuild-4G: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm
> > Memory: 4G
>
> I have no idea what this test does. Is this good or bad? Is that -27.2%
> a performance regression, or memory regression?
IMO, it is good. Memory usage is reduced.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > boot-slabinfo.num_objs
> >
> > 440000 *+*--*-*-*------*----*-*-*--*--------*-*--*-*-*--*-----------------+
> > | *.* *. *.*..* |
> > 420000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 400000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 380000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 360000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 340000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 320000 O+O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
> > | O O O |
> > 300000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> > [*] bisect-good sample
> > [O] bisect-bad sample
> >
> > To reproduce:
> >
> > apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
> > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> > cd lkp-tests
> > bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
> > bin/run-local job.yaml
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer:
> > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> > design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Huang, Ying
> >
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [ftrace] fef5aeeee9e: -27.2% boot-slabinfo.num_objs
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:28:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1419820095.26403.77.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141223083214.0b199465@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 08:32 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 11:10:17 +0800
> Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > commit fef5aeeee9e3717e7aea991a7ae9ff6a7a2d4c85 ("ftrace: Replace tramp_hash with old_*_hash to save space")
> >
> >
> > testbox/testcase/testparams: vm-kbuild-4G/boot/1
> >
> > e1effa0144a1ddf5 fef5aeeee9e3717e7aea991a7a
> > ---------------- --------------------------
> > %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \
> > 437752 ± 0% -27.2% 318545 ± 0% boot-slabinfo.num_objs
> >
> > vm-kbuild-4G: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm
> > Memory: 4G
>
> I have no idea what this test does. Is this good or bad? Is that -27.2%
> a performance regression, or memory regression?
IMO, it is good. Memory usage is reduced.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > boot-slabinfo.num_objs
> >
> > 440000 *+*--*-*-*------*----*-*-*--*--------*-*--*-*-*--*-----------------+
> > | *.* *. *.*..* |
> > 420000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 400000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 380000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 360000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 340000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 320000 O+O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
> > | O O O |
> > 300000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> > [*] bisect-good sample
> > [O] bisect-bad sample
> >
> > To reproduce:
> >
> > apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
> > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> > cd lkp-tests
> > bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
> > bin/run-local job.yaml
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer:
> > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> > design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Huang, Ying
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-29 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-23 3:10 [ftrace] fef5aeeee9e: -27.2% boot-slabinfo.num_objs Huang Ying
2014-12-23 3:10 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2014-12-23 13:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-12-23 13:32 ` [LKP] " Steven Rostedt
2014-12-29 2:28 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2014-12-29 2:28 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1419820095.26403.77.camel@intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.