From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Anand Moon <moon.linux@yahoo.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@samsung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>,
Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420633348.32552.2.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420632932-6964-1-git-send-email-moon.linux@yahoo.com>
On śro, 2015-01-07 at 17:45 +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> ARM Enable CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR to validation of kernel locks
>
> v2 Fixed the commit log
> This config item helps getting some useful information when lockup
> happens. If you want to validate locks then probably you want
> PROVE_LOCKING... but its overhead is larger.
>
> Anyway the overhead of LOCKUP_DETECTOR is small and multi_v7_defconfig
> has it enabled so I guess exynos may do it as well.
Err? Why did you include my response as commit message? It does not
really make sense.
Let me point this once again:
1. The commit message is inaccurate because CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR does
not validate the locks.
2. Please write proper commit message describing WHY you want to add
this config option.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Tested on Exynos5422 ODROID XU3 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <moon.linux@yahoo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> index 5ef14de..ecd9987 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
> +CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
> CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420633348.32552.2.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420632932-6964-1-git-send-email-moon.linux@yahoo.com>
On ?ro, 2015-01-07 at 17:45 +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> ARM Enable CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR to validation of kernel locks
>
> v2 Fixed the commit log
> This config item helps getting some useful information when lockup
> happens. If you want to validate locks then probably you want
> PROVE_LOCKING... but its overhead is larger.
>
> Anyway the overhead of LOCKUP_DETECTOR is small and multi_v7_defconfig
> has it enabled so I guess exynos may do it as well.
Err? Why did you include my response as commit message? It does not
really make sense.
Let me point this once again:
1. The commit message is inaccurate because CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR does
not validate the locks.
2. Please write proper commit message describing WHY you want to add
this config option.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Tested on Exynos5422 ODROID XU3 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <moon.linux@yahoo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> index 5ef14de..ecd9987 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
> +CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
> CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 12:15 [PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR Anand Moon
2015-01-07 12:15 ` Anand Moon
2015-01-07 12:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-01-07 12:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-01-07 12:30 ` Anand Moon
2015-01-07 12:30 ` Anand Moon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-06 17:42 Anand Moon
2015-01-06 17:42 ` Anand Moon
2015-01-07 9:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-01-07 9:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420633348.32552.2.camel@AMDC1943 \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gautam.vivek@samsung.com \
--cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=moon.linux@yahoo.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sachin.kamat@samsung.com \
--cc=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.