From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen/domain: Introduce domain_max_vcpus() helper and implement per arch
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:05:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421751923.10440.214.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421666496-10676-2-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 11:21 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This allows the common XEN_DOMCTL_max_vcpus handler to loose some x86-specific
> architecture knowledge.
>
> It turns out that Xen had the same magic number twice in-tree with different
> names (HVM_MAX_VCPUS and MAX_HVM_VCPUS). This removes all use of
> MAX_HVM_VCPUS, and x86 uses HVM_MAX_VCPUS from the public headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
For ARM:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
I'm assuming Jan will pickup the series for eventual commit, since the
bulk seems to be common and/or x86 related.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-19 11:21 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce the use of MAX_VIRT_CPUS in tree Andrew Cooper
2015-01-19 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen/domain: Introduce domain_max_vcpus() helper and implement per arch Andrew Cooper
2015-01-19 12:16 ` Simon Rowe
2015-01-19 12:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-19 12:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-01-19 12:59 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-20 10:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrew Cooper
2015-01-20 11:05 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-01-19 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen/evtchn: Reduce the size of the poll_mask where possible Andrew Cooper
2015-01-20 10:28 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-19 11:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/arinc653: Remove MAX_VIRT_CPUS bounds check Andrew Cooper
2015-01-20 10:34 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-20 14:20 ` Robert VanVossen
2015-01-19 11:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen/many: Drop redundant MAX_VIRT_CPUS bounds checks Andrew Cooper
2015-01-20 10:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-20 11:06 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421751923.10440.214.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.