From: eddie.huang@mediatek.com (Eddie Huang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:29:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426242563.18291.19.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150223135044.108ea32a65063a50aa36a309@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:27:56 +0800 Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add Mediatek MT63xx RTC driver
>
> There are a couple of checkpatch warnings which should be addressed,
> please:
>
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #150:
> new file mode 100644
>
> WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt6397-rtc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #488: FILE: drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c:334:
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", },
>
>
>
>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static u16 rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset)
> > +{
> > + u32 rdata = 0;
> > + u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> > +
> > + if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> > + regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, &rdata);
> > +
> > + return (u16)rdata;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rtc_write(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 data)
> > +{
> > + u32 addr;
> > +
> > + addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> > +
> > + if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> > + regmap_write(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
> > +}
>
> regmap_read() and regmap_write() can return errors. There is no
> checking for this.
>
I encounter some trouble when I add code to check return value of
regmap_read and regmap_write. Every RTC register access through regmap,
and there are many register read/write in this driver. If I check every
return value, the driver will become ugly. I try to make this driver
clean using following macro.
static int __rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 *data)
{
u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
return regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
return -EINVAL;
}
#define rtc_read(ret, rtc, offset, data) \
({ \
ret = __rtc_read(rtc, offset, data); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto rtc_exit; \
}) \
And function call rtc_read, rtc_write looks like:
static int mtk_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
{
unsigned long time;
struct mt6397_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int ret = 0;
u32 sec;
mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
do {
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &tm->tm_sec);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MIN, &tm->tm_min);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_HOU, &tm->tm_hour);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_DOM, &tm->tm_mday);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MTH, &tm->tm_mon);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_YEA, &tm->tm_year);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &sec);
} while (sec < tm->tm_sec);
mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
tm->tm_year += RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
tm->tm_mon--;
rtc_tm_to_time(tm, &time);
tm->tm_wday = (time / 86400 + 4) % 7;
return 0;
rtc_exit:
mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
return ret;
}
It's a little tricky, does anyone have good suggestion ?
Eddie
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
yh.chen@mediatek.com, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:29:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426242563.18291.19.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150223135044.108ea32a65063a50aa36a309@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:27:56 +0800 Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add Mediatek MT63xx RTC driver
>
> There are a couple of checkpatch warnings which should be addressed,
> please:
>
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #150:
> new file mode 100644
>
> WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt6397-rtc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #488: FILE: drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c:334:
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", },
>
>
>
>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static u16 rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset)
> > +{
> > + u32 rdata = 0;
> > + u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> > +
> > + if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> > + regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, &rdata);
> > +
> > + return (u16)rdata;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rtc_write(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 data)
> > +{
> > + u32 addr;
> > +
> > + addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> > +
> > + if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> > + regmap_write(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
> > +}
>
> regmap_read() and regmap_write() can return errors. There is no
> checking for this.
>
I encounter some trouble when I add code to check return value of
regmap_read and regmap_write. Every RTC register access through regmap,
and there are many register read/write in this driver. If I check every
return value, the driver will become ugly. I try to make this driver
clean using following macro.
static int __rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 *data)
{
u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
return regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
return -EINVAL;
}
#define rtc_read(ret, rtc, offset, data) \
({ \
ret = __rtc_read(rtc, offset, data); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto rtc_exit; \
}) \
And function call rtc_read, rtc_write looks like:
static int mtk_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
{
unsigned long time;
struct mt6397_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int ret = 0;
u32 sec;
mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
do {
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &tm->tm_sec);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MIN, &tm->tm_min);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_HOU, &tm->tm_hour);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_DOM, &tm->tm_mday);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MTH, &tm->tm_mon);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_YEA, &tm->tm_year);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &sec);
} while (sec < tm->tm_sec);
mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
tm->tm_year += RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
tm->tm_mon--;
rtc_tm_to_time(tm, &time);
tm->tm_wday = (time / 86400 + 4) % 7;
return 0;
rtc_exit:
mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
return ret;
}
It's a little tricky, does anyone have good suggestion ?
Eddie
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, <yh.chen@mediatek.com>,
<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:29:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426242563.18291.19.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150223135044.108ea32a65063a50aa36a309@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:27:56 +0800 Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add Mediatek MT63xx RTC driver
>
> There are a couple of checkpatch warnings which should be addressed,
> please:
>
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #150:
> new file mode 100644
>
> WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt6397-rtc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #488: FILE: drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c:334:
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", },
>
>
>
>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static u16 rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset)
> > +{
> > + u32 rdata = 0;
> > + u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> > +
> > + if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> > + regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, &rdata);
> > +
> > + return (u16)rdata;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rtc_write(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 data)
> > +{
> > + u32 addr;
> > +
> > + addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> > +
> > + if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> > + regmap_write(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
> > +}
>
> regmap_read() and regmap_write() can return errors. There is no
> checking for this.
>
I encounter some trouble when I add code to check return value of
regmap_read and regmap_write. Every RTC register access through regmap,
and there are many register read/write in this driver. If I check every
return value, the driver will become ugly. I try to make this driver
clean using following macro.
static int __rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 *data)
{
u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
return regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
return -EINVAL;
}
#define rtc_read(ret, rtc, offset, data) \
({ \
ret = __rtc_read(rtc, offset, data); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto rtc_exit; \
}) \
And function call rtc_read, rtc_write looks like:
static int mtk_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
{
unsigned long time;
struct mt6397_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int ret = 0;
u32 sec;
mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
do {
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &tm->tm_sec);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MIN, &tm->tm_min);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_HOU, &tm->tm_hour);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_DOM, &tm->tm_mday);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MTH, &tm->tm_mon);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_YEA, &tm->tm_year);
rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &sec);
} while (sec < tm->tm_sec);
mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
tm->tm_year += RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
tm->tm_mon--;
rtc_tm_to_time(tm, &time);
tm->tm_wday = (time / 86400 + 4) % 7;
return 0;
rtc_exit:
mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
return ret;
}
It's a little tricky, does anyone have good suggestion ?
Eddie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 9:27 [PATCH 0/2] Add Mediatek RTC driver Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: Add Mediatek RTC driver binding document Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-02-23 21:50 ` [rtc-linux] " Andrew Morton
2015-02-23 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-23 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-02 8:20 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-02 8:20 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-02 8:20 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-02 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-02 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-02 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-13 10:29 ` Eddie Huang [this message]
2015-03-13 10:29 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 10:29 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 10:57 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-13 10:57 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-13 10:57 ` Sascha Hauer
[not found] ` <20150313105742.GS24885-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-16 9:52 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-16 9:52 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-16 9:52 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 11:19 ` Matthias Brugger
2015-03-13 11:19 ` Matthias Brugger
2015-03-16 15:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-16 15:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20150316153048.GC10068-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-17 12:31 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-17 12:31 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-17 12:31 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-17 13:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-17 13:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-17 13:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-18 3:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-18 3:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-18 3:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-18 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-18 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426242563.18291.19.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.