From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: "JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
"uma.sharma523@gmail.com" <uma.sharma523@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:26:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426512378.32500.32.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5506E11F020000780006A426@mail.emea.novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 673 bytes --]
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:56 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.03.15 at 13:51, <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 03/16/2015 12:48 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> >> Them returning garbage isn't what needs fixing. Instead the code
> >> here should use a different condition to check whether this is the
> >> boot CPU (e.g. looking at system_state). And that can very well be
> >> done directly in this patch.
> >
> > What do you suggest, then?
>
> My preferred solution would be, as said, to leverage system_state.
> Provided the state to look for is consistent between x86 and ARM.
>
Ok, I'll look into using that.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 18:11 [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code Uma Sharma
2015-03-13 18:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-13 19:13 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 12:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 12:51 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 12:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 13:26 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2015-03-17 18:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 7:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18 8:53 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 15:26 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-18 15:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18 16:08 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-18 16:30 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 16:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 17:05 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 10:03 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-19 11:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 11:40 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 12:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 12:35 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 13:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 12:45 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 12:49 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426512378.32500.32.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=uma.sharma523@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.