All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
	"xumengpanda@gmail.com" <xumengpanda@gmail.com>,
	"JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] xen: rework locking for dump of scheduler info (debug-key r)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:18:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426591136.32500.67.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55080A71.1070705@eu.citrix.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1141 bytes --]

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 11:05 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 10:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:

> > Finally, as said in different contexts earlier, I think unconditionally
> > acquiring locks in dumping routines isn't the best practice. At least
> > in non-debug builds I think these should be try-locks only, skipping
> > the dumping when a lock is busy.
> 
> You mean so that we don't block the console if there turns out to be a
> deadlock?
> 
> That makes some sense; but on a busy system that would mean a
> non-negligible chance that any give keystroke would be missing
> information about some cpu or other, which would be pretty frustrating
> for someone trying to figure out the state of their system.
> 
Mmm... that's a very good point, actually, which I did not think about.

> Would it make sense to have a version of spin_trylock for use in this
> kind of situation that waits & retries a reasonable number of times
> before giving up?
> 
Probably. After all, if one comes to the point of sending a debug-key,
he most likely want to see the system status at (almost) any cost...

Regards,
Dario

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-17 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 17:04 [PATCH 0/7] Improving dumping of scheduler related info Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] xen: sched_rt: avoid ASSERT()ing on runq dump if there are no domains Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:18   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 20:31   ` Meng Xu
2015-03-17 10:41   ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-17 11:00     ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] xen: sched_rt: implement the .free_pdata hook Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 17:10   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:23     ` Meng Xu
2015-03-17 13:00       ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:17   ` Meng Xu
2015-03-16 18:21   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] xen: rework locking for dump of scheduler info (debug-key r) Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:41   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 20:04   ` Meng Xu
2015-03-17 10:54   ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-17 11:05     ` George Dunlap
2015-03-17 11:18       ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2015-03-17 11:25       ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-17 11:32         ` George Dunlap
2015-03-17 11:43           ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-17 12:01             ` George Dunlap
2015-03-17 11:14     ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-17 11:31       ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] xen: print online pCPUs and free pCPUs when dumping scheduler info Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:37   ` Juergen Gross
2015-03-16 18:46   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-17 10:59   ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] xen: make dumping vcpu info look better Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:48   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 20:06   ` Meng Xu
2015-03-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] xen: sched_credit2: more info when dumping Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 18:50   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] xen: sched_rt: print useful affinity " Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 19:05   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-17 13:51     ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 20:30   ` Meng Xu
2015-03-17 11:10     ` George Dunlap
2015-03-17 11:28       ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18  1:05       ` Meng Xu
2015-03-17 14:12     ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18  1:07       ` Meng Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1426591136.32500.67.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=xumengpanda@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.