All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libxl: In domain death search, start search at first domid we want
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:19:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426681140.18247.353.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426606259-9692-2-git-send-email-jfehlig@suse.com>

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:30 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> 
> From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> 
> When domain_death_xswatch_callback needed a further call to
> xc_domain_getinfolist it would restart it with the last domain it
> found rather than the first one it wants.
> 
> If it only wants one it will also only ask for one domain.  The result
> would then be that it gets the previous domain again (ie, the previous
> one to the one it wants), which still doesn't reveal the answer to the
> question, and it would therefore loop again.
> 
> It's completely unclear to me why I thought it was a good idea to
> start the xc_domain_getinfolist with the last domain previously found
> rather than the first one left un-confirmed.  The code has been that
> way since it was introduced.

Is it because the xc_domain_getinfolist will fetch at most:
        int nentries = LIBXL_TAILQ_NEXT(evg, entry) ? 200 : 1;
entries?

After your change then if the domid we are looking for is the 201st
domain then won't we just keep going round looking at the first 200
(undying) domains?

Ian.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-18 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-17 15:30 [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Fixes from Ian Jackson Jim Fehlig
2015-03-17 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] libxl: In domain death search, start search at first domid we want Jim Fehlig
2015-03-17 17:34   ` Wei Liu
2015-03-18 12:19   ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-03-18 17:47     ` Jim Fehlig
2015-03-19 10:22       ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-17 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] libxl: Domain destroy: unlock userdata earlier Jim Fehlig
2015-03-17 17:34   ` Wei Liu
2015-03-18 12:20     ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-18 17:52       ` Jim Fehlig
2015-03-20 11:58         ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-17 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] libxl: Domain destroy: fork Jim Fehlig
2015-03-17 18:04   ` Wei Liu
2015-03-18 12:28     ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-18 12:27   ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-20 15:14     ` Jim Fehlig
2015-03-20 16:03       ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1426681140.18247.353.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jfehlig@suse.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.