From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: Set pref for mem64 resource of pcie device
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:56:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428569815.18187.71.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUnpKmQmeHvBpk1t-NSAPuWAC9tX7LXeGpVR1w78i658g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 21:11 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> That way should be more intrusive to current code, as we are using
> type_mask checking to share the code among
> parent(pref)/child(pref), parent(no-pref)/child(pref), and
> parent(no-pref)/child(pref)
That's fine, as long as the helper knows which one is the parent and
which one is the child.
In fact, as "cute" as the mask trick is, I think it would generally make
the code more self explanatory if it explicitly tested for the
combinations that are supported, ie something like
if (parent_is_pref && !child_is_pref && child->pcie_only)
...
else if (!parent_is_pref)
...
etc...
The impact in performance would be in the noise and the logic of the
algorithm a LOT more explicit.
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: Set pref for mem64 resource of pcie device
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 08:56:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428569815.18187.71.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUnpKmQmeHvBpk1t-NSAPuWAC9tX7LXeGpVR1w78i658g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 21:11 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> That way should be more intrusive to current code, as we are using
> type_mask checking to share the code among
> parent(pref)/child(pref), parent(no-pref)/child(pref), and
> parent(no-pref)/child(pref)
That's fine, as long as the helper knows which one is the parent and
which one is the child.
In fact, as "cute" as the mask trick is, I think it would generally make
the code more self explanatory if it explicitly tested for the
combinations that are supported, ie something like
if (parent_is_pref && !child_is_pref && child->pcie_only)
...
else if (!parent_is_pref)
...
etc...
The impact in performance would be in the noise and the logic of the
algorithm a LOT more explicit.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-01 2:57 [PATCH 0/3] PCI/sparc: Fix booting with T5-8 Yinghai Lu
2015-04-01 2:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-01 2:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_addr_t Yinghai Lu
2015-04-01 2:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-03 18:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 18:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 19:05 ` David Miller
2015-04-03 19:05 ` David Miller
2015-04-04 3:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-04 3:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-03 19:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 19:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-04 3:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-04 3:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-04 3:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-04 3:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-04 12:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-04 12:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-04 12:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-04 12:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-04 19:48 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-04 19:48 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-04 19:48 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-04 19:48 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-05 3:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-05 3:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-05 3:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-05 3:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-06 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-06 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-06 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-06 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2015-04-01 2:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] sparc/PCI: Add mem64 resource parsing for root bus Yinghai Lu
2015-04-01 2:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-03 20:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 20:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 20:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-01 2:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: Set pref for mem64 resource of pcie device Yinghai Lu
2015-04-01 2:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-06 22:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-06 22:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-06 22:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-06 22:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-06 22:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-06 22:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-07 1:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-07 1:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-07 3:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-07 3:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-07 5:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-07 5:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-07 12:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-07 12:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-07 0:35 ` David Miller
2015-04-07 0:35 ` David Miller
2015-04-07 16:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-07 16:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-08 15:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-08 15:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-08 16:08 ` David Miller
2015-04-08 16:08 ` David Miller
2015-04-08 21:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-08 21:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 0:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-09 0:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-09 3:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 3:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 4:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-09 4:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-09 8:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2015-04-09 8:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 4:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-09 4:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-09 8:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 8:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 18:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-09 18:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-09 23:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-09 23:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-10 4:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-10 4:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-02 20:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI/sparc: Fix booting with T5-8 David Miller
2015-04-02 20:37 ` David Miller
2015-04-02 22:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-02 22:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-04-02 22:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-02 22:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-03 0:42 ` David Miller
2015-04-03 0:42 ` David Miller
2015-05-16 15:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-16 15:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-16 15:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-16 15:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-27 23:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-05-27 23:27 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428569815.18187.71.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.ahern@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.