From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy.schevchenko@gmail.com,
boon.leong.ong@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, derek.browne@intel.com,
josef.ahmad@intel.com, erik.nyquist@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/quark: Add Quark embedded SRAM support
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:44:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430815487.3843.24.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430705875-6990-2-git-send-email-pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 03:17 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/Makefile
> obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_IMR) += imr.o
(Your change to drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig now makes it possible that
imr.o will be part of a module. More on that below.)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_ESRAM) += esram.o
INTEL_ESRAM is a bool Kconfig symbol, so esram.o will never be part of a
module, right?
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-quark/esram.c
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, esram_ids);
> +module_init(esram_init);
> +module_exit(esram_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Embedded SRAM overlay driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> +
(Trailing empty line.)
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> config INTEL_IMR
> - bool "Intel Isolated Memory Region support"
> + tristate "Intel Isolated Memory Region support"
It's not obvious, at least to me, why this symbol is changed to
tristate. Does that follow from the other changes?
> default n
> depends on X86_INTEL_QUARK && IOSF_MBI
> ---help---
> +config INTEL_ESRAM
> + bool "Intel Embedded SRAM (eSRAM) support"
If I'm reading the corresponding Makefile change correctly, esram.o will
never be part of a module. But esram.c is added with some module
specific boilerplate. (Note, again, that I'm not sure whether
KBUILD_MODNAME is module specific.)
Was your intention perhaps to make this a tristate symbol?
> + default n
> + depends on X86_INTEL_QUARK && IOSF_MBI
> + select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
> + ---help---
> + This options provides an API to allocate memory from Embedded SRAM
> + (eSRAM) present on Quark X1000 SoC processors.
> + eSRAM is a 512 KiB block of low-latency SRAM organized as
> + 128 * 4 KiB pages or as one 512 KiB chunk of memory. This driver
> + enables eSRAM in per-page overlay mode and provides a gen_pool
> + allocator which allows allocation of memory from the eSRAM pool.
> +
> + If you are running on a Galileo/Quark say Y here.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 2:17 [PATCH 0/2] x86/quark: Add eSRAM driver and test code Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-04 2:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/quark: Add Quark embedded SRAM support Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-04 15:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 13:48 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-05 20:07 ` Darren Hart
2015-05-05 22:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-05 8:44 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-05-05 13:03 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-06 9:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 15:46 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-04 2:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/quark: Add Quark embedded SRAM self-test Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-05 8:34 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-06 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 14:27 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-05-06 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 9:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/quark: Add eSRAM driver and test code Ingo Molnar
2015-05-06 15:27 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430815487.3843.24.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=andy.schevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=derek.browne@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=erik.nyquist@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=josef.ahmad@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.