Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM: add secondary_startup_arm prototype in header file

[Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 22:19 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:02:40AM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 2015-05-16 9:58 GMT+02:00 Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>:
> > > Put secondary_startup_arm() prototype in arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > so users doesn't have to add extern prototype in their code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > index 18f5a55..f5cffb7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct secondary_data {
> > >  extern struct secondary_data secondary_data;
> > >  extern volatile int pen_release;
> > >  extern void secondary_startup(void);
> > > +extern void secondary_startup_arm(void);
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> This change should also end up in the patch system as its core ARM stuff,
> especially if it's not scheduled for merging through arm-soc.
> 

Russell,

Thanks. I just put these 2 patches into the patch system.
Since patch 7/9 depends on this patch, I think we should merge this
patch(2/9) through arm-soc tree to prevent build fail.

Joe.C


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html