All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mgorman@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, riel@redhat.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:22:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143330175664@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From b0dc2b9bb4ab782115b964310518ee0b17784277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:17:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single
 node machines

NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of
num_online_nodes (online nodes).

The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1 or higher
will enable NUMA balancing.  This will incur useless overhead due to
minor faults with the impact depending on the workload.  These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1:

  			       vanilla     patched
  NUMA base PTE updates          5113158           0
  NUMA huge PMD updates              643           0
  NUMA page range updates        5442374           0
  NUMA hint faults               2109622           0
  NUMA hint local faults         2109622           0
  NUMA hint local percent            100         100
  NUMA pages migrated                  0           0

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.8+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index ede26291d4aa..747743237d9f 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
 	if (numabalancing_override)
 		set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
 
-	if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+	if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
 		pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
 			"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
 			"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",


                 reply	other threads:[~2015-06-03  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143330175664@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.