FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From b0dc2b9bb4ab782115b964310518ee0b17784277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:17:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single
 node machines

NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of
num_online_nodes (online nodes).

The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1 or higher
will enable NUMA balancing.  This will incur useless overhead due to
minor faults with the impact depending on the workload.  These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1:

  			       vanilla     patched
  NUMA base PTE updates          5113158           0
  NUMA huge PMD updates              643           0
  NUMA page range updates        5442374           0
  NUMA hint faults               2109622           0
  NUMA hint local faults         2109622           0
  NUMA hint local percent            100         100
  NUMA pages migrated                  0           0

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.8+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index ede26291d4aa..747743237d9f 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
 	if (numabalancing_override)
 		set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
 
-	if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+	if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
 		pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
 			"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
 			"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",