From: alex.williamson@redhat.com (Alex Williamson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] VFIO platform reset
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:17:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434644277.3700.41.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN9JPjFKVTh7h=cPFecUTP56Muq54vruas3YG1D32hXd0Mh0LQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 17:23 +0200, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I tested and reviewed the patches, everything's fine for me.
Hi Baptiste,
Would you like to provide a Sign-off/Ack/Review tag for the series then?
> I agree to be maintainer of vfio platform drivers, though I don't
> think the volume of patches about VFIO will justify a new mailing
> list.
Ok, I'll officially post the patch for MAINTAINERS then. Until someone
complains, we'll continue to use the kvm list. Thanks,
Alex
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 11:09 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> In situations where the userspace driver is stopped abnormally and the
> >> VFIO platform device is released, the assigned HW device currently is
> >> left running. As a consequence the HW device might continue issuing IRQs
> >> and performing DMA accesses.
> >>
> >> On release, no physical IRQ handler is setup anymore. Also the DMA buffers
> >> are unmapped leading to IOMMU aborts. So there is no serious consequence.
> >>
> >> However when assigning that HW device again to another userspace driver,
> >> this latter might face some unexpected IRQs and DMA accesses, which are
> >> the result of the previous assignment.
> >>
> >> In virtualization use-case, a VM newly granted with that HW device may be
> >> impacted by the assignment of that device to a previous VM:
> >> - IRQs may be injected very early when booting the new guest, even before
> >> the guest driver has initialized leading to possible driver state
> >> inconsistency.
> >> - DMA accesses may hit the newly mapped VM address space at addresses that
> >> may jeopardize the integrity of the newly installed VM.
> >>
> >> Obviously the criticity depends on the assigned HW device.
> >>
> >> As opposed to PCI, there is no standard mechanism to reset the platform
> >> device.
> >>
> >> This series proposes to implement device specific reset functions in
> >> separate in-kernel vfio reset modules. The vfio-platform driver holds
> >> a whitelist of implemented triplets (compat string, module name,
> >> reset function name). When the vfio-platform driver is probed it identifies
> >> the fellow reset module/function matching the compat string of the
> >> device, if any, and forces the load of this reset module.
> >>
> >> A first reset module is provided: the vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac
> >> module which implements a basic reset for the Calxeda xgmac.
> >>
> >> The series can be found at
> >> https://git.linaro.org/people/eric.auger/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/v4.1-rc8-reset-v4
> >>
> >> History:
> >> v3 -> v4:
> >> - fix the commit message of "VFIO: platform: add reset struct and lookup table"
> >
> > Baptiste,
> >
> > Any comments? Should we also add something like this to MAINTAINERS
> > before we go much further?
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index d8afd29..c6bf7f6 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -10545,6 +10545,12 @@ F: drivers/vfio/
> > F: include/linux/vfio.h
> > F: include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> >
> > +VFIO PLATFORM DRIVER
> > +M: Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>
> > +L: kvm at vger.kernel.org
> > +S: Maintained
> > +F: drivers/vfio/platform/
> > +
> > VIDEOBUF2 FRAMEWORK
> > M: Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>
> > M: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> >
> > I'm not sure what you want to be the primary list, maybe it's time to
> > ask for a vfio list. Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >> - remove void module_init/exit functions in calxeda reset module
> >> - remove enum vfio_platform_reset_type
> >> - for reset lookup, use ARRAY_SIZE
> >> - in reset put use symbol_put_addr
> >>
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >> - much simplified compared to v1 although principle of external modules is
> >> kept: removed mechanism of dynamic registration of reset functions
> >> - list is replaced by whitelist lookup table
> >> - name of the reset function also stored in the lookup table
> >> - autoload of reset modules
> >>
> >> RFC -> PATCH v1:
> >> - solution now based on a lookup list instead of specialized driver
> >>
> >>
> >> Eric Auger (4):
> >> VFIO: platform: add reset struct and lookup table
> >> VFIO: platform: add reset callback
> >> VFIO: platform: populate the reset function on probe
> >> VFIO: platform: Calxeda xgmac reset module
> >>
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/Kconfig | 2 +
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile | 2 +
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Kconfig | 7 ++
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Makefile | 5 ++
> >> .../platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 60 ++++++++++++++-
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 7 ++
> >> 7 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Kconfig
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Makefile
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> >>
> >
> >
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>,
eric.auger@st.com,
"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVER"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
patches@linaro.org,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>,
Daniel Raho <s.raho@virtualopensystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] VFIO platform reset
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:17:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434644277.3700.41.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN9JPjFKVTh7h=cPFecUTP56Muq54vruas3YG1D32hXd0Mh0LQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 17:23 +0200, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I tested and reviewed the patches, everything's fine for me.
Hi Baptiste,
Would you like to provide a Sign-off/Ack/Review tag for the series then?
> I agree to be maintainer of vfio platform drivers, though I don't
> think the volume of patches about VFIO will justify a new mailing
> list.
Ok, I'll officially post the patch for MAINTAINERS then. Until someone
complains, we'll continue to use the kvm list. Thanks,
Alex
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 11:09 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> In situations where the userspace driver is stopped abnormally and the
> >> VFIO platform device is released, the assigned HW device currently is
> >> left running. As a consequence the HW device might continue issuing IRQs
> >> and performing DMA accesses.
> >>
> >> On release, no physical IRQ handler is setup anymore. Also the DMA buffers
> >> are unmapped leading to IOMMU aborts. So there is no serious consequence.
> >>
> >> However when assigning that HW device again to another userspace driver,
> >> this latter might face some unexpected IRQs and DMA accesses, which are
> >> the result of the previous assignment.
> >>
> >> In virtualization use-case, a VM newly granted with that HW device may be
> >> impacted by the assignment of that device to a previous VM:
> >> - IRQs may be injected very early when booting the new guest, even before
> >> the guest driver has initialized leading to possible driver state
> >> inconsistency.
> >> - DMA accesses may hit the newly mapped VM address space at addresses that
> >> may jeopardize the integrity of the newly installed VM.
> >>
> >> Obviously the criticity depends on the assigned HW device.
> >>
> >> As opposed to PCI, there is no standard mechanism to reset the platform
> >> device.
> >>
> >> This series proposes to implement device specific reset functions in
> >> separate in-kernel vfio reset modules. The vfio-platform driver holds
> >> a whitelist of implemented triplets (compat string, module name,
> >> reset function name). When the vfio-platform driver is probed it identifies
> >> the fellow reset module/function matching the compat string of the
> >> device, if any, and forces the load of this reset module.
> >>
> >> A first reset module is provided: the vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac
> >> module which implements a basic reset for the Calxeda xgmac.
> >>
> >> The series can be found at
> >> https://git.linaro.org/people/eric.auger/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/v4.1-rc8-reset-v4
> >>
> >> History:
> >> v3 -> v4:
> >> - fix the commit message of "VFIO: platform: add reset struct and lookup table"
> >
> > Baptiste,
> >
> > Any comments? Should we also add something like this to MAINTAINERS
> > before we go much further?
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index d8afd29..c6bf7f6 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -10545,6 +10545,12 @@ F: drivers/vfio/
> > F: include/linux/vfio.h
> > F: include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> >
> > +VFIO PLATFORM DRIVER
> > +M: Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>
> > +L: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> > +S: Maintained
> > +F: drivers/vfio/platform/
> > +
> > VIDEOBUF2 FRAMEWORK
> > M: Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>
> > M: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> >
> > I'm not sure what you want to be the primary list, maybe it's time to
> > ask for a vfio list. Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >> - remove void module_init/exit functions in calxeda reset module
> >> - remove enum vfio_platform_reset_type
> >> - for reset lookup, use ARRAY_SIZE
> >> - in reset put use symbol_put_addr
> >>
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >> - much simplified compared to v1 although principle of external modules is
> >> kept: removed mechanism of dynamic registration of reset functions
> >> - list is replaced by whitelist lookup table
> >> - name of the reset function also stored in the lookup table
> >> - autoload of reset modules
> >>
> >> RFC -> PATCH v1:
> >> - solution now based on a lookup list instead of specialized driver
> >>
> >>
> >> Eric Auger (4):
> >> VFIO: platform: add reset struct and lookup table
> >> VFIO: platform: add reset callback
> >> VFIO: platform: populate the reset function on probe
> >> VFIO: platform: Calxeda xgmac reset module
> >>
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/Kconfig | 2 +
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile | 2 +
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Kconfig | 7 ++
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Makefile | 5 ++
> >> .../platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 60 ++++++++++++++-
> >> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 7 ++
> >> 7 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Kconfig
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Makefile
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> >>
> >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 9:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] VFIO platform reset Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] VFIO: platform: add reset struct and lookup table Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] VFIO: platform: add reset callback Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] VFIO: platform: populate the reset function on probe Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] VFIO: platform: Calxeda xgmac reset module Eric Auger
2015-06-15 9:09 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 22:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] VFIO platform reset Alex Williamson
2015-06-17 22:31 ` Alex Williamson
2015-06-18 15:23 ` Baptiste Reynal
2015-06-18 15:23 ` Baptiste Reynal
2015-06-18 16:17 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2015-06-18 16:17 ` Alex Williamson
2015-06-19 7:53 ` Baptiste Reynal
2015-06-19 7:53 ` Baptiste Reynal
2015-06-22 7:58 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-22 15:43 ` Alex Williamson
2015-06-22 15:43 ` Alex Williamson
2015-08-27 11:56 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-27 11:56 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-27 13:05 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-27 13:05 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434644277.3700.41.camel@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.