Re: [PATCH 1/7] libxc: fix uninitialized variable in xc_cpuid_pv_policy()

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] libxc: fix uninitialized variable in xc_cpuid_pv_policy()"):
> > On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Unfortunately xc_cpuid_pv_policy doesn't return an error code.  I
> > > think it needs to.  So that's rather a yak.
> > 
> > I was about to say it's not one worth shaving, but actually although
> > this returns void it is static and has exactly one caller which can
> > return errors -- so it's a very easy yakk to shave it seems.
> 
> I guess part of my view is that the point of having Coverity spot
> anomalies is to find broken code and fix it.
> 
> To then look at the issues which we spot as a result of looking at the
> code, when prodded by Coverity, and decide to fix only half of the
> problem, is to waste the opportunity for improvement presented by
> Coverity.  (Or to look at it another way it is a waste of the effort
> of setting up Coverity and then wading through the false positives.)

This is a good way to think of it, thanks.

Ian.