From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: [Btrfs] c9dc4c65785: +9.8% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:16:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436321800.5489.279.camel@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2725 bytes --]
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
commit c9dc4c6578502c2085705347375b82089aad18d0 ("Btrfs: two stage dirty block group writeout")
testcase/path_params/tbox_group: fsmark/performance-1x-1t-1HDD-btrfs-4M-60G-NoSync/ivb44
4c6d1d85ad89fd8e c9dc4c6578502c208570534737
---------------- --------------------------
462211 ± 1% +16.8% 539707 ± 0% fsmark.app_overhead
35.27 ± 0% +9.8% 38.74 ± 1% fsmark.files_per_sec
9 ± 0% +17.8% 10 ± 4% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
9864 ± 2% +156.9% 25345 ± 4% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
21057 ± 0% -9.0% 19165 ± 1% uptime.idle
68983 ± 2% +19.1% 82190 ± 4% softirqs.RCU
129619 ± 0% +3.2% 133743 ± 0% vmstat.io.bo
1 ± 0% +100.0% 2 ± 0% vmstat.procs.b
18873 ± 0% +14.9% 21692 ± 1% vmstat.system.cs
1787510 ± 1% +117.0% 3878984 ± 2% meminfo.Dirty
5585235 ± 0% +25.5% 7011242 ± 0% meminfo.Writeback
8276795 ± 10% +15.9% 9592682 ± 0% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
8287205 ± 10% +16.0% 9611684 ± 0% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
2447873 ± 42% -67.9% 785086 ± 33% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
2413662 ± 43% -68.1% 771115 ± 31% numa-numastat.node1.local_node
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% time.elapsed_time
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% time.elapsed_time.max
9 ± 0% +17.8% 10 ± 4% time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
0.41 ± 1% +17.1% 0.48 ± 4% time.user_time
9864 ± 2% +156.9% 25345 ± 4% time.voluntary_context_switches
5.189e+08 ± 0% +72.6% 8.956e+08 ± 1% cpuidle.C1-IVT.time
4626942 ± 19% +49.6% 6924087 ± 22% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.time
2646692 ± 7% +75.0% 4630890 ± 23% cpuidle.C3-IVT.time
2.028e+10 ± 0% -11.1% 1.803e+10 ± 1% cpuidle.C6-IVT.time
268137 ± 0% +12.2% 300911 ± 2% cpuidle.C6-IVT.usage
222 ± 11% +47.0% 326 ± 25% cpuidle.POLL.usage
0.69 ± 2% +7.2% 0.74 ± 3% turbostat.%Busy
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Ying Huang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@01.org>
Subject: [lkp] [Btrfs] c9dc4c65785: +9.8% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:16:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436321800.5489.279.camel@intel.com> (raw)
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
commit c9dc4c6578502c2085705347375b82089aad18d0 ("Btrfs: two stage dirty block group writeout")
testcase/path_params/tbox_group: fsmark/performance-1x-1t-1HDD-btrfs-4M-60G-NoSync/ivb44
4c6d1d85ad89fd8e c9dc4c6578502c208570534737
---------------- --------------------------
462211 ± 1% +16.8% 539707 ± 0% fsmark.app_overhead
35.27 ± 0% +9.8% 38.74 ± 1% fsmark.files_per_sec
9 ± 0% +17.8% 10 ± 4% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
9864 ± 2% +156.9% 25345 ± 4% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
21057 ± 0% -9.0% 19165 ± 1% uptime.idle
68983 ± 2% +19.1% 82190 ± 4% softirqs.RCU
129619 ± 0% +3.2% 133743 ± 0% vmstat.io.bo
1 ± 0% +100.0% 2 ± 0% vmstat.procs.b
18873 ± 0% +14.9% 21692 ± 1% vmstat.system.cs
1787510 ± 1% +117.0% 3878984 ± 2% meminfo.Dirty
5585235 ± 0% +25.5% 7011242 ± 0% meminfo.Writeback
8276795 ± 10% +15.9% 9592682 ± 0% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
8287205 ± 10% +16.0% 9611684 ± 0% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
2447873 ± 42% -67.9% 785086 ± 33% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
2413662 ± 43% -68.1% 771115 ± 31% numa-numastat.node1.local_node
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% time.elapsed_time
435 ± 0% -9.0% 396 ± 1% time.elapsed_time.max
9 ± 0% +17.8% 10 ± 4% time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
0.41 ± 1% +17.1% 0.48 ± 4% time.user_time
9864 ± 2% +156.9% 25345 ± 4% time.voluntary_context_switches
5.189e+08 ± 0% +72.6% 8.956e+08 ± 1% cpuidle.C1-IVT.time
4626942 ± 19% +49.6% 6924087 ± 22% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.time
2646692 ± 7% +75.0% 4630890 ± 23% cpuidle.C3-IVT.time
2.028e+10 ± 0% -11.1% 1.803e+10 ± 1% cpuidle.C6-IVT.time
268137 ± 0% +12.2% 300911 ± 2% cpuidle.C6-IVT.usage
222 ± 11% +47.0% 326 ± 25% cpuidle.POLL.usage
0.69 ± 2% +7.2% 0.74 ± 3% turbostat.%Busy
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Ying Huang
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 2:16 Huang Ying [this message]
2015-07-08 2:16 ` [lkp] [Btrfs] c9dc4c65785: +9.8% fsmark.files_per_sec Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436321800.5489.279.camel@intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.