All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm-mpath: always return reservation conflict
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:35:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436960108.31121.41.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436959404-14035-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>

On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 13:23 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> If dm-mpath encounters an reservation conflict it should not
> fail the path (as communication with the target is not affected)
> but should rather retry on another path.
> However, in doing so we might be inducing a ping-pong between
> paths, with no guarantee of any forward progress.
> And arguably a reservation conflict is an unexpected error,
> so we should be passing it upwards to allow the application
> to take appropriate steps.

If I interpret the code correctly, you've changed the behaviour from the
current try all paths and fail them, ultimately passing the reservation
conflict up if all paths fail to return reservation conflict
immediately, keeping all paths running.  This assumes that the
reservation isn't path specific because if we encounter a path specific
reservation, you've altered the behaviour from route around to fail.

The case I think the original code was for is SAN Volume controllers
which use path specific SCSI-3 reservations effectively to do traffic
control and allow favoured paths.  Have you verified that nothing we
encounter in the enterprise uses path specific reservations for
multipath shaping any more?

James

> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> index 5a67671..e65d266 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> @@ -1269,7 +1269,16 @@ static int do_end_io(struct multipath *m, struct request *clone,
>  	if (noretry_error(error))
>  		return error;
>  
> -	if (mpio->pgpath)
> +	/*
> +	 * EBADE signals an reservation conflict.
> +	 * We shouldn't fail the path here as we can communicate with
> +	 * the target. We should failover to the next path, but in
> +	 * doing so we might be causing a ping-pong between paths.
> +	 * So just return the reservation conflict error.
> +	 */
> +	if (error == -EBADE)
> +		r = error;
> +	else if (mpio->pgpath)
>  		fail_path(mpio->pgpath);
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&m->lock, flags);
> @@ -1277,9 +1286,6 @@ static int do_end_io(struct multipath *m, struct request *clone,
>  		if (!m->queue_if_no_path) {
>  			if (!__must_push_back(m))
>  				r = -EIO;
> -		} else {
> -			if (error == -EBADE)
> -				r = error;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);




  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-15 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-15 11:23 [PATCH] dm-mpath: always return reservation conflict Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-15 11:35 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2015-07-15 11:52   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-15 11:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-15 12:02       ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-15 12:01     ` James Bottomley
2015-07-15 12:15       ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-15 13:20         ` Mike Snitzer
2015-07-16  5:07   ` [PATCH] " Christophe Varoqui
2015-07-16  7:54     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-16 14:40       ` Hannes Reinecke
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-02 12:36 [PING / RESEND] handling reservation conflicts in dm-mpath Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 12:36 ` [PATCH] dm-mpath: always return reservation conflict Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436960108.31121.41.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.