Re: Checkpatch: False positive

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 16:43 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:35:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > #31: 
> > >  arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c         | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 
> I guess those are in the limbo land between the end of message and
> beginning of the patch itself.  Perhaps the test should at least stop at
> the end of header marker, at the '---'.
> 
> -apw

Maybe, but the test already stops at signatures like
Signed-off-by: that should always be above the ---.

This might help, but there are _many_ false positives.

The other thing that might help is for people to take
the warnings the script produces less seriously.

Maybe convert:

ERROR -> defect
WARNING -> unstylish
CHECK -> nitpick

or some such

---

 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index d5ce29a..5e7afa7 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2213,6 +2213,11 @@ sub process {
 			$in_commit_log = 0;
 		}
 
+# Check for patch separator
+		if ($line =~ /^---$/) {
+			$in_commit_log = 0;
+		}
+
 # Check if MAINTAINERS is being updated.  If so, there's probably no need to
 # emit the "does MAINTAINERS need updating?" message on file add/move/delete
 		if ($line =~ /^\s*MAINTAINERS\s*\|/) {