From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
"Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>--cc=Ard Biesheuvel"
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: support initrd outside of mapped RAM
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:20:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438161638.3129.4.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438093961-15536-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 10:32 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> When booting an arm64 kernel w/initrd using UEFI/grub, use of mem= will likely
> cut off part or all of the initrd. This leaves it outside the kernel linear
> map which leads to failure when unpacking.
Have we got a similar issue for the device-tree blob?
--
Tixy
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
"Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>--cc=Ard Biesheuvel"
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: support initrd outside of mapped RAM
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:20:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438161638.3129.4.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150729092038.Q0y85DqGqYYPuNcM-zpXMqtUlhwrkUDm5vvwBkPdPzg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438093961-15536-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 10:32 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> When booting an arm64 kernel w/initrd using UEFI/grub, use of mem= will likely
> cut off part or all of the initrd. This leaves it outside the kernel linear
> map which leads to failure when unpacking.
Have we got a similar issue for the device-tree blob?
--
Tixy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: support initrd outside of mapped RAM
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:20:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438161638.3129.4.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438093961-15536-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 10:32 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> When booting an arm64 kernel w/initrd using UEFI/grub, use of mem= will likely
> cut off part or all of the initrd. This leaves it outside the kernel linear
> map which leads to failure when unpacking.
Have we got a similar issue for the device-tree blob?
--
Tixy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-29 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-28 14:32 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: support initrd outside of mapped RAM Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: add utility for early copy from unmapped ram Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: support initrd outside kernel linear map Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:32 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: support initrd outside of mapped RAM Mark Rutland
2015-07-28 14:59 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-28 14:59 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-28 15:07 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 15:07 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 15:07 ` Mark Salter
2015-07-28 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-28 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-28 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-29 9:20 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2015-07-29 9:20 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-07-29 9:20 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-07-29 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-29 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-29 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438161638.3129.4.camel@linaro.org \
--to=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.