All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, alan@signal11.us, jonatan@myeden.se,
	stefan@osg.samsung.com, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bluetooth-next 14/21] mrf24j40: rework rx handling to async rx handling
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:22:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439468568-22288-15-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439468568-22288-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com>

This patch prepares that we can do the receive handling inside interrupt
context by using spi_async. This is necessary for introduce a
non-threaded irq handling.

Also we drop the bit setting for "RXDECINV" at register "BBREG1", we do
a driectly full write of register "BBREG1", because it contains the bit
RXDECINV only.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c | 275 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c
index 8851475..044d6c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/mrf24j40.c
@@ -167,6 +167,20 @@ struct mrf24j40 {
 	u8 tx_post_buf[2];
 	struct spi_transfer tx_post_trx;
 
+	/* for protect/unprotect/read length rxfifo */
+	struct spi_message rx_msg;
+	u8 rx_buf[3];
+	struct spi_transfer rx_trx;
+
+	/* receive handling */
+	struct spi_message rx_buf_msg;
+	u8 rx_addr_buf[2];
+	struct spi_transfer rx_addr_trx;
+	u8 rx_lqi_buf[2];
+	struct spi_transfer rx_lqi_trx;
+	u8 rx_fifo_buf[RX_FIFO_SIZE];
+	struct spi_transfer rx_fifo_buf_trx;
+
 	struct mutex buffer_mutex; /* only used to protect buf */
 	u8 *buf; /* 3 bytes. Used for SPI single-register transfers. */
 };
@@ -472,32 +486,6 @@ static const struct regmap_bus mrf24j40_long_regmap_bus = {
 	.val_format_endian_default = REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG,
 };
 
-static int write_short_reg(struct mrf24j40 *devrec, u8 reg, u8 value)
-{
-	int ret;
-	struct spi_message msg;
-	struct spi_transfer xfer = {
-		.len = 2,
-		.tx_buf = devrec->buf,
-		.rx_buf = devrec->buf,
-	};
-
-	spi_message_init(&msg);
-	spi_message_add_tail(&xfer, &msg);
-
-	mutex_lock(&devrec->buffer_mutex);
-	devrec->buf[0] = MRF24J40_WRITESHORT(reg);
-	devrec->buf[1] = value;
-
-	ret = spi_sync(devrec->spi, &msg);
-	if (ret)
-		dev_err(printdev(devrec),
-			"SPI write Failed for short register 0x%hhx\n", reg);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&devrec->buffer_mutex);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int read_short_reg(struct mrf24j40 *devrec, u8 reg, u8 *val)
 {
 	int ret = -1;
@@ -526,37 +514,6 @@ static int read_short_reg(struct mrf24j40 *devrec, u8 reg, u8 *val)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int read_long_reg(struct mrf24j40 *devrec, u16 reg, u8 *value)
-{
-	int ret;
-	u16 cmd;
-	struct spi_message msg;
-	struct spi_transfer xfer = {
-		.len = 3,
-		.tx_buf = devrec->buf,
-		.rx_buf = devrec->buf,
-	};
-
-	spi_message_init(&msg);
-	spi_message_add_tail(&xfer, &msg);
-
-	cmd = MRF24J40_READLONG(reg);
-	mutex_lock(&devrec->buffer_mutex);
-	devrec->buf[0] = cmd >> 8 & 0xff;
-	devrec->buf[1] = cmd & 0xff;
-	devrec->buf[2] = 0;
-
-	ret = spi_sync(devrec->spi, &msg);
-	if (ret)
-		dev_err(printdev(devrec),
-			"SPI read Failed for long register 0x%hx\n", reg);
-	else
-		*value = devrec->buf[2];
-
-	mutex_unlock(&devrec->buffer_mutex);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static void write_tx_buf_complete(void *context)
 {
 	struct mrf24j40 *devrec = context;
@@ -616,78 +573,6 @@ static int mrf24j40_tx(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return write_tx_buf(devrec, 0x000, skb->data, skb->len);
 }
 
-static int mrf24j40_read_rx_buf(struct mrf24j40 *devrec,
-				u8 *data, u8 *len, u8 *lqi)
-{
-	u8 rx_len;
-	u8 addr[2];
-	u8 lqi_rssi[2];
-	u16 cmd;
-	int ret;
-	struct spi_message msg;
-	struct spi_transfer addr_xfer = {
-		.len = 2,
-		.tx_buf = &addr,
-	};
-	struct spi_transfer data_xfer = {
-		.len = 0x0, /* set below */
-		.rx_buf = data,
-	};
-	struct spi_transfer status_xfer = {
-		.len = 2,
-		.rx_buf = &lqi_rssi,
-	};
-
-	/* Get the length of the data in the RX FIFO. The length in this
-	 * register exclues the 1-byte length field at the beginning. */
-	ret = read_long_reg(devrec, REG_RX_FIFO, &rx_len);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
-
-	/* Range check the RX FIFO length, accounting for the one-byte
-	 * length field at the beginning. */
-	if (rx_len > RX_FIFO_SIZE-1) {
-		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "Invalid length read from device. Performing short read.\n");
-		rx_len = RX_FIFO_SIZE-1;
-	}
-
-	if (rx_len > *len) {
-		/* Passed in buffer wasn't big enough. Should never happen. */
-		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "Buffer not big enough. Performing short read\n");
-		rx_len = *len;
-	}
-
-	/* Set up the commands to read the data. */
-	cmd = MRF24J40_READLONG(REG_RX_FIFO+1);
-	addr[0] = cmd >> 8 & 0xff;
-	addr[1] = cmd & 0xff;
-	data_xfer.len = rx_len;
-
-	spi_message_init(&msg);
-	spi_message_add_tail(&addr_xfer, &msg);
-	spi_message_add_tail(&data_xfer, &msg);
-	spi_message_add_tail(&status_xfer, &msg);
-
-	ret = spi_sync(devrec->spi, &msg);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "SPI RX Buffer Read Failed.\n");
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	*lqi = lqi_rssi[0];
-	*len = rx_len;
-
-#ifdef DEBUG
-	print_hex_dump(KERN_DEBUG, "mrf24j40 rx: ",
-		       DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, data, *len, 0);
-	pr_debug("mrf24j40 rx: lqi: %02hhx rssi: %02hhx\n",
-		 lqi_rssi[0], lqi_rssi[1]);
-#endif
-
-out:
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int mrf24j40_ed(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 *level)
 {
 	/* TODO: */
@@ -823,53 +708,91 @@ static int mrf24j40_filter(struct ieee802154_hw *hw,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int mrf24j40_handle_rx(struct mrf24j40 *devrec)
+static void mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf_unlock(struct mrf24j40 *devrec)
 {
-	u8 len = RX_FIFO_SIZE;
-	u8 lqi = 0;
-	u8 val;
-	int ret = 0;
-	int ret2;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	int ret;
 
-	/* Turn off reception of packets off the air. This prevents the
-	 * device from overwriting the buffer while we're reading it. */
-	ret = read_short_reg(devrec, REG_BBREG1, &val);
+	/* Turn back on reception of packets off the air. */
+	devrec->rx_msg.complete = NULL;
+	devrec->rx_buf[0] = MRF24J40_WRITESHORT(REG_BBREG1);
+	devrec->rx_buf[1] = 0x00; /* CLR RXDECINV */
+	ret = spi_async(devrec->spi, &devrec->rx_msg);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out;
-	val |= 4; /* SET RXDECINV */
-	write_short_reg(devrec, REG_BBREG1, val);
+		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "failed to unlock rx buffer\n");
+}
 
-	skb = dev_alloc_skb(len);
+static void mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf_complete(void *context)
+{
+	struct mrf24j40 *devrec = context;
+	u8 len = devrec->rx_buf[2];
+	u8 rx_local_buf[RX_FIFO_SIZE];
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	memcpy(rx_local_buf, devrec->rx_fifo_buf, len);
+	mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf_unlock(devrec);
+
+	skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU);
 	if (!skb) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out;
+		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "failed to allocate skb\n");
+		return;
 	}
 
-	ret = mrf24j40_read_rx_buf(devrec, skb_put(skb, len), &len, &lqi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "Failure reading RX FIFO\n");
-		kfree_skb(skb);
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
+	memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), rx_local_buf, len);
+	ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(devrec->hw, skb, 0);
+}
+
+static void mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf(void *context)
+{
+	struct mrf24j40 *devrec = context;
+	u16 cmd;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* if length is invalid read the full MTU */
+	if (!ieee802154_is_valid_psdu_len(devrec->rx_buf[2]))
+		devrec->rx_buf[2] = IEEE802154_MTU;
+
+	cmd = MRF24J40_READLONG(REG_RX_FIFO + 1);
+	devrec->rx_addr_buf[0] = cmd >> 8 & 0xff;
+	devrec->rx_addr_buf[1] = cmd & 0xff;
+	devrec->rx_fifo_buf_trx.len = devrec->rx_buf[2];
+	ret = spi_async(devrec->spi, &devrec->rx_buf_msg);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "failed to read rx buffer\n");
+		mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf_unlock(devrec);
 	}
+}
+
+static void mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_len(void *context)
+{
+	struct mrf24j40 *devrec = context;
+	u16 cmd;
+	int ret;
 
-	/* TODO: Other drivers call ieee20154_rx_irqsafe() here (eg: cc2040,
-	 * also from a workqueue).  I think irqsafe is not necessary here.
-	 * Can someone confirm? */
-	ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(devrec->hw, skb, lqi);
+	/* read the length of received frame */
+	devrec->rx_msg.complete = mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf;
+	devrec->rx_trx.len = 3;
+	cmd = MRF24J40_READLONG(REG_RX_FIFO);
+	devrec->rx_buf[0] = cmd >> 8 & 0xff;
+	devrec->rx_buf[1] = cmd & 0xff;
 
-	dev_dbg(printdev(devrec), "RX Handled\n");
+	ret = spi_async(devrec->spi, &devrec->rx_msg);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(printdev(devrec), "failed to read rx buffer length\n");
+		mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf_unlock(devrec);
+	}
+}
 
-out:
-	/* Turn back on reception of packets off the air. */
-	ret2 = read_short_reg(devrec, REG_BBREG1, &val);
-	if (ret2)
-		return ret2;
-	val &= ~0x4; /* Clear RXDECINV */
-	write_short_reg(devrec, REG_BBREG1, val);
+static int mrf24j40_handle_rx(struct mrf24j40 *devrec)
+{
+	/* Turn off reception of packets off the air. This prevents the
+	 * device from overwriting the buffer while we're reading it.
+	 */
+	devrec->rx_msg.complete = mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_len;
+	devrec->rx_trx.len = 2;
+	devrec->rx_buf[0] = MRF24J40_WRITESHORT(REG_BBREG1);
+	devrec->rx_buf[1] = 0x04; /* SET RXDECINV */
 
-	return ret;
+	return spi_async(devrec->spi, &devrec->rx_msg);
 }
 
 static const struct ieee802154_ops mrf24j40_ops = {
@@ -1025,6 +948,29 @@ mrf24j40_setup_tx_spi_messages(struct mrf24j40 *devrec)
 	spi_message_add_tail(&devrec->tx_post_trx, &devrec->tx_post_msg);
 }
 
+static void
+mrf24j40_setup_rx_spi_messages(struct mrf24j40 *devrec)
+{
+	spi_message_init(&devrec->rx_msg);
+	devrec->rx_msg.context = devrec;
+	devrec->rx_trx.len = 2;
+	devrec->rx_trx.tx_buf = devrec->rx_buf;
+	devrec->rx_trx.rx_buf = devrec->rx_buf;
+	spi_message_add_tail(&devrec->rx_trx, &devrec->rx_msg);
+
+	spi_message_init(&devrec->rx_buf_msg);
+	devrec->rx_buf_msg.context = devrec;
+	devrec->rx_buf_msg.complete = mrf24j40_handle_rx_read_buf_complete;
+	devrec->rx_addr_trx.len = 2;
+	devrec->rx_addr_trx.tx_buf = devrec->rx_addr_buf;
+	spi_message_add_tail(&devrec->rx_addr_trx, &devrec->rx_buf_msg);
+	devrec->rx_fifo_buf_trx.rx_buf = devrec->rx_fifo_buf;
+	spi_message_add_tail(&devrec->rx_fifo_buf_trx, &devrec->rx_buf_msg);
+	devrec->rx_lqi_trx.len = 2;
+	devrec->rx_lqi_trx.rx_buf = devrec->rx_lqi_buf;
+	spi_message_add_tail(&devrec->rx_lqi_trx, &devrec->rx_buf_msg);
+}
+
 static void  mrf24j40_phy_setup(struct mrf24j40 *devrec)
 {
 	ieee802154_random_extended_addr(&devrec->hw->phy->perm_extended_addr);
@@ -1054,6 +1000,7 @@ static int mrf24j40_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	devrec->hw->flags = IEEE802154_HW_TX_OMIT_CKSUM | IEEE802154_HW_AFILT;
 
 	mrf24j40_setup_tx_spi_messages(devrec);
+	mrf24j40_setup_rx_spi_messages(devrec);
 
 	devrec->regmap_short = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi,
 						    &mrf24j40_short_regmap);
-- 
2.5.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-13 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-13 12:22 [RFC bluetooth-next 00/21] mrf24j40: async rx/tx handling and new features Alexander Aring
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 01/21] mrf24j40: cleanup define identation Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 12:59   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 02/21] mrf24j40: use ieee802154_alloc_hw for private data Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:03   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 03/21] mrf24j40: calling ieee802154_register_hw at last Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:06   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 04/21] mrf24j40: remove spi settings overwrite Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:14   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-28  7:50     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-28  7:58       ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 05/21] mrf24j40: add device-tree support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:16   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 06/21] mrf24j40: add default channel setting Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:24   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 07/21] mrf24j40: add random extended addr generation Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:25   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 08/21] mrf24j40: add more register defines Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:28   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 09/21] mrf24j40: add regmap support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 17:45   ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-28  8:37   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 10/21] mrf24j40: use regmap for register access Alexander Aring
2015-08-28  8:43   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 11/21] mrf24j40: change to frame delivery with crc Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:30   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 12/21] ieee802154: add helpers for frame control checks Alexander Aring
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 13/21] mrf24j40: rework tx handling to async tx handling Alexander Aring
2015-08-28  8:50   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2015-08-28  8:55   ` [RFC bluetooth-next 14/21] mrf24j40: rework rx handling to async rx handling Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 15/21] mrf24j40: async interrupt handling Alexander Aring
2015-08-28  8:57   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 16/21] mrf24j40: add csma params support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:46   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-28  7:53     ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 17/21] mrf24j40: add cca mode support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:50   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-27 17:49   ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 18/21] mrf24j40: add cca ed level support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:52   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-27 17:44   ` Alexander Aring
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 19/21] mrf24j40: add tx power support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 13:59   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 20/21] mrf24j40: add promiscuous mode support Alexander Aring
2015-08-27 14:00   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-13 12:22 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 21/21] mrf24j40: change irq trigger type behaviour Alexander Aring
2015-08-28  8:28   ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-18 13:54 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 00/21] mrf24j40: async rx/tx handling and new features Alan Ott
2015-08-27 12:29 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-08-27 12:33   ` Alan Ott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1439468568-22288-15-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@signal11.us \
    --cc=jonatan@myeden.se \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.