From: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink.
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:16:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440454646.3879.93.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440425051.2526.14.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 14:04 +0000, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Em Qui, 2015-08-20 às 17:55 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> > This is wrong since my commit (89251b17). The intention of that
> > commit was to remove this one here that is also wrong anyway,
> > but it was forgotten.
>
> You mentioned the current code is wrong, but it would be really nice
> if
> you could describe why it is wrong and what are the implications of
> it
> being wrong. Was this causing some specific problem or was it just
> found by code inspection? In case it was found just by code
> inspection,
> you could try to elaborate on the possible problems brought by the
> bad
> commit.
nothing critical, by wrong I meant "& ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE" doesn't
do anything at all.... I don't remember if when I added I intended to
be informative or I removed the val read from dpdc and forgot to remove
this part...
>
> A more elaborate description helps not only the reviewers, but also
> the
> possible backporters and even helps us judging whether it should be
> merged by Daniel or Jani.
>
> Anyway, as far as I see the patch looks correct, so if you could
> provide another paragraph for Daniel to amend on the commit message:
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Thanks
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index a04b4dc..51f0514 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -170,9 +170,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >
> > aux_clock_divider = intel_dp
> > ->get_aux_clock_divider(intel_dp, 0);
> >
> > - drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
> > - DP_PSR_ENABLE &
> > ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE);
> > -
> > /* Enable AUX frame sync at sink */
> > if (dev_priv->psr.aux_frame_sync)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 0:55 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Fix PSR disable sequence on core platforms Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-24 14:14 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:18 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-24 14:29 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:28 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: PSR: Mask LPSP hw tracking back again Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-26 9:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-26 1:56 ` [4/7] " Brian Norris
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-24 17:03 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:35 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Remove psr re-activation delay on HSW+ Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Reduce PSR re-activation time for VLV/CHV Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-28 23:38 ` shuang.he
2015-08-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:16 ` Vivi, Rodrigo [this message]
2015-09-26 1:40 ` [1/7] " Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440454646.3879.93.camel@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.