From: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Leif Lindholm
<leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Matt Fleming
<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] efi/arm64: clean up efi_get_fdt_params() interface
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:15:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440598503.13044.1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9KwJfr6x8A607CsbAvpLUG2pqLPzcXsqhvmQnrcGy_ug-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 16:04 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 15:24, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > As we now have a common debug infrastructure between core and arm64
> > efi,
> > drop the bit of the interface passing verbose output flags around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 ++----
> > include/linux/efi.h | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > index 612ad5e..ab5eeb6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> > struct efi_fdt_params params;
> >
>
> Actually, one nit: struct efi_fdt_params has a verbose field that was
No it doesn't. :)
> never used in the first place, but was added [supposedly] to convey
> the same as EFI_DBG that we have now. So I think you should remove
> that as well.
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] efi/arm64: clean up efi_get_fdt_params() interface
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:15:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440598503.13044.1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9KwJfr6x8A607CsbAvpLUG2pqLPzcXsqhvmQnrcGy_ug@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 16:04 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 15:24, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> > As we now have a common debug infrastructure between core and arm64
> > efi,
> > drop the bit of the interface passing verbose output flags around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 ++----
> > include/linux/efi.h | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > index 612ad5e..ab5eeb6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> > struct efi_fdt_params params;
> >
>
> Actually, one nit: struct efi_fdt_params has a verbose field that was
No it doesn't. :)
> never used in the first place, but was added [supposedly] to convey
> the same as EFI_DBG that we have now. So I think you should remove
> that as well.
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] efi/arm64: clean up efi_get_fdt_params() interface
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:15:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440598503.13044.1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9KwJfr6x8A607CsbAvpLUG2pqLPzcXsqhvmQnrcGy_ug@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 16:04 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 15:24, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> > As we now have a common debug infrastructure between core and arm64
> > efi,
> > drop the bit of the interface passing verbose output flags around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 ++----
> > include/linux/efi.h | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > index 612ad5e..ab5eeb6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> > struct efi_fdt_params params;
> >
>
> Actually, one nit: struct efi_fdt_params has a verbose field that was
No it doesn't. :)
> never used in the first place, but was added [supposedly] to convey
> the same as EFI_DBG that we have now. So I think you should remove
> that as well.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 13:24 [PATCH 0/3] unify efi debug output across architectures Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] efi/x86: move efi=debug option parsing to core Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 17:25 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-26 17:25 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-26 13:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] efi/arm64: clean up efi_get_fdt_params() interface Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 14:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-26 14:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu9KwJfr6x8A607CsbAvpLUG2pqLPzcXsqhvmQnrcGy_ug-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-26 14:15 ` Mark Salter [this message]
2015-08-26 14:15 ` Mark Salter
2015-08-26 14:15 ` Mark Salter
2015-08-26 14:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-26 14:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-28 13:32 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-28 13:32 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <1440595498-30630-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-26 13:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: use core efi=debug instead of uefi_debug command line parameter Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 13:24 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <1440595498-30630-3-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-26 17:24 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-26 17:24 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-26 17:24 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150826172455.GB2837-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-26 17:30 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 17:30 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-08-26 17:30 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <20150826173000.GG10728-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-26 18:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-26 18:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-26 18:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-28 13:32 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-28 13:32 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-26 13:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] unify efi debug output across architectures Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-26 13:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-26 13:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440598503.13044.1.camel@redhat.com \
--to=msalter-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.