From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [x86/build] b2c51106c75: -18.1% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:40:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441161631.3138.7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150805083858.GA21506@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13291 bytes --]
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 10:38 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/asm
> > commit b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9 ("x86/build: Fix detection of GCC -mpreferred-stack-boundary support")
>
> Does the performance regression go away reproducibly if you do:
>
> git revert b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
>
> ?
Sorry for reply so late!
Revert the commit will restore part of the performance, as below.
parent commit: f2a50f8b7da45ff2de93a71393e715a2ab9f3b68
the commit: b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
revert commit: 987d12601a4a82cc2f2151b1be704723eb84cb9d
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/test:
wsm/will-it-scale/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/readseek2
commit:
f2a50f8b7da45ff2de93a71393e715a2ab9f3b68
b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
987d12601a4a82cc2f2151b1be704723eb84cb9d
f2a50f8b7da45ff2 b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5 987d12601a4a82cc2f2151b1be
---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
879002 ± 0% -18.1% 720270 ± 7% -3.6% 847011 ± 2% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
0.02 ± 0% +34.5% 0.02 ± 7% +5.6% 0.02 ± 2% will-it-scale.scalability
11144 ± 0% +0.1% 11156 ± 0% +10.6% 12320 ± 0% will-it-scale.time.minor_page_faults
769.30 ± 0% -0.9% 762.15 ± 0% +1.1% 777.42 ± 0% will-it-scale.time.system_time
26153173 ± 0% +7.0% 27977076 ± 0% +3.5% 27078124 ± 0% will-it-scale.time.voluntary_context_switches
2964 ± 2% +1.4% 3004 ± 1% -51.9% 1426 ± 2% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
0.06 ± 27% +154.5% 0.14 ± 44% +122.7% 0.12 ± 24% turbostat.CPU%c3
370683 ± 0% +6.2% 393491 ± 0% +2.4% 379575 ± 0% vmstat.system.cs
11144 ± 0% +0.1% 11156 ± 0% +10.6% 12320 ± 0% time.minor_page_faults
15.70 ± 2% +14.5% 17.98 ± 0% +1.5% 15.94 ± 1% time.user_time
830343 ± 56% -54.0% 382128 ± 39% -22.3% 645308 ± 65% cpuidle.C1E-NHM.time
788.25 ± 14% -21.7% 617.25 ± 16% -12.3% 691.00 ± 3% cpuidle.C1E-NHM.usage
2489132 ± 20% +79.3% 4464147 ± 33% +78.4% 4440574 ± 21% cpuidle.C3-NHM.time
1082762 ±162% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% +189.3% 3132030 ±110% latency_stats.avg.nfs_wait_on_request.nfs_updatepage.nfs_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.nfs_file_write.__vfs_write.vfs_write.SyS_write.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
102189 ± 2% -2.1% 100087 ± 5% -32.9% 68568 ± 2% latency_stats.hits.pipe_wait.pipe_read.__vfs_read.vfs_read.SyS_read.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
1082762 ±162% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% +289.6% 4217977 ±109% latency_stats.max.nfs_wait_on_request.nfs_updatepage.nfs_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.nfs_file_write.__vfs_write.vfs_write.SyS_write.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
1082762 ±162% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% +478.5% 6264061 ±110% latency_stats.sum.nfs_wait_on_request.nfs_updatepage.nfs_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.nfs_file_write.__vfs_write.vfs_write.SyS_write.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
5.10 ± 2% -8.0% 4.69 ± 1% +13.0% 5.76 ± 1% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.__kernel_text_address.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk.__account_scheduler_latency
2.58 ± 8% +19.5% 3.09 ± 3% -1.8% 2.54 ± 11% perf-profile.cpu-cycles._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.finish_wait.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry
7.02 ± 3% +9.2% 7.67 ± 2% +7.1% 7.52 ± 3% perf-profile.cpu-cycles._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.prepare_to_wait_exclusive.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry
3.07 ± 2% +14.8% 3.53 ± 3% -1.4% 3.03 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.finish_wait.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry.shmem_getpage_gfp
3.05 ± 5% -8.4% 2.79 ± 4% -5.2% 2.90 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.hrtimer_start_range_ns.tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick.__tick_nohz_idle_enter.tick_nohz_idle_enter.cpu_startup_entry
0.89 ± 5% -7.6% 0.82 ± 3% +16.3% 1.03 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.is_ftrace_trampoline.__kernel_text_address.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk
0.98 ± 3% -25.1% 0.74 ± 7% -16.8% 0.82 ± 2% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.is_ftrace_trampoline.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk.__account_scheduler_latency
1.58 ± 3% -5.2% 1.50 ± 2% +44.2% 2.28 ± 1% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.is_module_text_address.__kernel_text_address.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk
1.82 ± 18% +46.6% 2.67 ± 3% -32.6% 1.23 ± 56% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.finish_wait.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page
8.05 ± 3% +9.5% 8.82 ± 3% +5.4% 8.49 ± 2% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.prepare_to_wait_exclusive.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry.shmem_getpage_gfp
1.16 ± 2% +6.9% 1.25 ± 5% +11.4% 1.30 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.put_page.shmem_file_read_iter.__vfs_read.vfs_read.sys_read
11102 ± 1% +0.0% 11102 ± 1% -95.8% 468.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.active_objs
198.25 ± 1% +0.0% 198.25 ± 1% -93.9% 12.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.active_slabs
11102 ± 1% +0.0% 11102 ± 1% -95.8% 468.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.num_objs
198.25 ± 1% +0.0% 198.25 ± 1% -93.9% 12.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.num_slabs
341.25 ± 14% +2.9% 351.00 ± 11% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.blkdev_ioc.active_objs
341.25 ± 14% +2.9% 351.00 ± 11% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.blkdev_ioc.num_objs
438.00 ± 16% -8.3% 401.50 ± 20% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.file_lock_ctx.active_objs
438.00 ± 16% -8.3% 401.50 ± 20% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.file_lock_ctx.num_objs
4398 ± 1% +1.4% 4462 ± 0% -14.5% 3761 ± 2% slabinfo.ftrace_event_field.active_objs
4398 ± 1% +1.4% 4462 ± 0% -14.5% 3761 ± 2% slabinfo.ftrace_event_field.num_objs
3947 ± 2% +10.6% 4363 ± 3% +107.1% 8175 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_objs
93.00 ± 2% +10.8% 103.00 ± 3% +120.2% 204.75 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_slabs
3947 ± 2% +10.6% 4363 ± 3% +118.4% 8620 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_objs
93.00 ± 2% +10.8% 103.00 ± 3% +120.2% 204.75 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_slabs
1794 ± 0% +3.2% 1851 ± 2% +12.2% 2012 ± 3% slabinfo.trace_event_file.active_objs
1794 ± 0% +3.2% 1851 ± 2% +12.2% 2012 ± 3% slabinfo.trace_event_file.num_objs
7065 ± 7% -5.4% 6684 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.active_objs
160.50 ± 7% -5.5% 151.75 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.active_slabs
7091 ± 7% -5.6% 6694 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.num_objs
160.50 ± 7% -5.5% 151.75 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.num_slabs
857.50 ± 29% +75.7% 1506 ± 78% +157.6% 2209 ± 33% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.blocked_load_avg
52.75 ± 29% -29.4% 37.25 ± 60% +103.3% 107.25 ± 43% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.load
914.50 ± 29% +69.9% 1553 ± 77% +155.6% 2337 ± 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.tg_load_contrib
7.75 ± 34% -64.5% 2.75 ± 64% -12.9% 6.75 ±115% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.nr_spread_over
1135 ± 20% -43.6% 640.75 ± 49% -18.8% 922.50 ± 51% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.blocked_load_avg
1215 ± 21% -43.1% 691.50 ± 46% -21.3% 956.25 ± 50% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_contrib
38.50 ± 21% +129.9% 88.50 ± 36% +96.1% 75.50 ± 56% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.load
26.00 ± 20% +98.1% 51.50 ± 46% +142.3% 63.00 ± 53% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.runnable_load_avg
128.25 ± 18% +227.5% 420.00 ± 43% +152.4% 323.75 ± 68% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.utilization_load_avg
28320 ± 12% -6.3% 26545 ± 11% -19.4% 22813 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
1015 ± 78% +101.1% 2042 ± 25% +64.4% 1669 ± 73% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
1069 ± 72% +100.2% 2140 ± 23% +61.2% 1722 ± 70% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
619.25 ± 12% -6.3% 580.25 ± 11% -19.2% 500.25 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
88.75 ± 14% -47.3% 46.75 ± 36% -24.5% 67.00 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.load
59.25 ± 23% -41.4% 34.75 ± 34% -6.3% 55.50 ± 12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.runnable_load_avg
315.50 ± 45% -64.6% 111.67 ± 1% -12.1% 277.25 ± 3% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.utilization_load_avg
2246758 ± 7% +87.6% 4213925 ± 65% -2.2% 2197475 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#0.nr_switches
2249376 ± 7% +87.4% 4215969 ± 65% -2.2% 2199216 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_count
1121438 ± 7% +81.0% 2030313 ± 61% -2.2% 1096479 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_goidle
1151160 ± 7% +86.5% 2146608 ± 64% -1.9% 1129264 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#0.ttwu_count
33.75 ± 15% -22.2% 26.25 ± 6% -8.9% 30.75 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#1.cpu_load[3]
33.25 ± 10% -18.0% 27.25 ± 7% -3.8% 32.00 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#1.cpu_load[4]
41.75 ± 29% +23.4% 51.50 ± 33% +53.9% 64.25 ± 16% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[1]
40.00 ± 18% +24.4% 49.75 ± 18% +49.4% 59.75 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[2]
39.25 ± 14% +22.3% 48.00 ± 10% +38.9% 54.50 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[3]
39.50 ± 15% +20.3% 47.50 ± 6% +30.4% 51.50 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[4]
5269004 ± 1% +27.8% 6731790 ± 30% +1.4% 5342560 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#10.nr_switches
5273193 ± 1% +27.8% 6736526 ± 30% +1.4% 5345791 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#10.sched_count
2633974 ± 1% +27.8% 3365271 ± 30% +1.4% 2670901 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#10.sched_goidle
2644149 ± 1% +26.9% 3356318 ± 30% +1.9% 2693295 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#10.ttwu_count
26.50 ± 37% +116.0% 57.25 ± 48% +109.4% 55.50 ± 29% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[0]
30.75 ± 15% +66.7% 51.25 ± 31% +65.9% 51.00 ± 21% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[1]
33.50 ± 10% +37.3% 46.00 ± 22% +39.6% 46.75 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[2]
37.00 ± 11% +15.5% 42.75 ± 19% +29.7% 48.00 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[4]
508300 ± 11% -0.6% 505024 ± 1% +18.1% 600291 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#4.avg_idle
454696 ± 9% -5.9% 427894 ± 25% +21.8% 553608 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#5.avg_idle
66.00 ± 27% +11.0% 73.25 ± 37% -46.6% 35.25 ± 22% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[0]
62.00 ± 36% +12.5% 69.75 ± 45% -41.5% 36.25 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[1]
247681 ± 19% +21.0% 299747 ± 10% +28.7% 318764 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#8.avg_idle
5116609 ± 4% +34.5% 6884238 ± 33% +55.2% 7942254 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.nr_switches
5120531 ± 4% +34.5% 6889156 ± 33% +55.2% 7945270 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.sched_count
2557822 ± 4% +34.5% 3441428 ± 33% +55.2% 3970337 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.sched_goidle
2565307 ± 4% +32.9% 3410042 ± 33% +54.0% 3949696 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.ttwu_count
0.00 ±141% +4.2e+05% 4.76 ±173% +47.7% 0.00 ±-59671% sched_debug.rt_rq[10]:/.rt_time
155259 ± 0% +0.0% 155259 ± 0% -42.2% 89723 ± 0% sched_debug.sysctl_sched.sysctl_sched_features
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [x86/build] b2c51106c75: -18.1% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:40:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441161631.3138.7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150805083858.GA21506@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 10:38 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/asm
> > commit b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9 ("x86/build: Fix detection of GCC -mpreferred-stack-boundary support")
>
> Does the performance regression go away reproducibly if you do:
>
> git revert b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
>
> ?
Sorry for reply so late!
Revert the commit will restore part of the performance, as below.
parent commit: f2a50f8b7da45ff2de93a71393e715a2ab9f3b68
the commit: b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
revert commit: 987d12601a4a82cc2f2151b1be704723eb84cb9d
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/test:
wsm/will-it-scale/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/readseek2
commit:
f2a50f8b7da45ff2de93a71393e715a2ab9f3b68
b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5d739f3d4b7cbc9
987d12601a4a82cc2f2151b1be704723eb84cb9d
f2a50f8b7da45ff2 b2c51106c7581866c37ffc77c5 987d12601a4a82cc2f2151b1be
---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
879002 ± 0% -18.1% 720270 ± 7% -3.6% 847011 ± 2% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
0.02 ± 0% +34.5% 0.02 ± 7% +5.6% 0.02 ± 2% will-it-scale.scalability
11144 ± 0% +0.1% 11156 ± 0% +10.6% 12320 ± 0% will-it-scale.time.minor_page_faults
769.30 ± 0% -0.9% 762.15 ± 0% +1.1% 777.42 ± 0% will-it-scale.time.system_time
26153173 ± 0% +7.0% 27977076 ± 0% +3.5% 27078124 ± 0% will-it-scale.time.voluntary_context_switches
2964 ± 2% +1.4% 3004 ± 1% -51.9% 1426 ± 2% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
0.06 ± 27% +154.5% 0.14 ± 44% +122.7% 0.12 ± 24% turbostat.CPU%c3
370683 ± 0% +6.2% 393491 ± 0% +2.4% 379575 ± 0% vmstat.system.cs
11144 ± 0% +0.1% 11156 ± 0% +10.6% 12320 ± 0% time.minor_page_faults
15.70 ± 2% +14.5% 17.98 ± 0% +1.5% 15.94 ± 1% time.user_time
830343 ± 56% -54.0% 382128 ± 39% -22.3% 645308 ± 65% cpuidle.C1E-NHM.time
788.25 ± 14% -21.7% 617.25 ± 16% -12.3% 691.00 ± 3% cpuidle.C1E-NHM.usage
2489132 ± 20% +79.3% 4464147 ± 33% +78.4% 4440574 ± 21% cpuidle.C3-NHM.time
1082762 ±162% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% +189.3% 3132030 ±110% latency_stats.avg.nfs_wait_on_request.nfs_updatepage.nfs_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.nfs_file_write.__vfs_write.vfs_write.SyS_write.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
102189 ± 2% -2.1% 100087 ± 5% -32.9% 68568 ± 2% latency_stats.hits.pipe_wait.pipe_read.__vfs_read.vfs_read.SyS_read.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
1082762 ±162% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% +289.6% 4217977 ±109% latency_stats.max.nfs_wait_on_request.nfs_updatepage.nfs_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.nfs_file_write.__vfs_write.vfs_write.SyS_write.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
1082762 ±162% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% +478.5% 6264061 ±110% latency_stats.sum.nfs_wait_on_request.nfs_updatepage.nfs_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.nfs_file_write.__vfs_write.vfs_write.SyS_write.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
5.10 ± 2% -8.0% 4.69 ± 1% +13.0% 5.76 ± 1% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.__kernel_text_address.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk.__account_scheduler_latency
2.58 ± 8% +19.5% 3.09 ± 3% -1.8% 2.54 ± 11% perf-profile.cpu-cycles._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.finish_wait.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry
7.02 ± 3% +9.2% 7.67 ± 2% +7.1% 7.52 ± 3% perf-profile.cpu-cycles._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.prepare_to_wait_exclusive.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry
3.07 ± 2% +14.8% 3.53 ± 3% -1.4% 3.03 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.finish_wait.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry.shmem_getpage_gfp
3.05 ± 5% -8.4% 2.79 ± 4% -5.2% 2.90 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.hrtimer_start_range_ns.tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick.__tick_nohz_idle_enter.tick_nohz_idle_enter.cpu_startup_entry
0.89 ± 5% -7.6% 0.82 ± 3% +16.3% 1.03 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.is_ftrace_trampoline.__kernel_text_address.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk
0.98 ± 3% -25.1% 0.74 ± 7% -16.8% 0.82 ± 2% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.is_ftrace_trampoline.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk.__account_scheduler_latency
1.58 ± 3% -5.2% 1.50 ± 2% +44.2% 2.28 ± 1% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.is_module_text_address.__kernel_text_address.print_context_stack.dump_trace.save_stack_trace_tsk
1.82 ± 18% +46.6% 2.67 ± 3% -32.6% 1.23 ± 56% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irqsave.finish_wait.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page
8.05 ± 3% +9.5% 8.82 ± 3% +5.4% 8.49 ± 2% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.prepare_to_wait_exclusive.__wait_on_bit_lock.__lock_page.find_lock_entry.shmem_getpage_gfp
1.16 ± 2% +6.9% 1.25 ± 5% +11.4% 1.30 ± 5% perf-profile.cpu-cycles.put_page.shmem_file_read_iter.__vfs_read.vfs_read.sys_read
11102 ± 1% +0.0% 11102 ± 1% -95.8% 468.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.active_objs
198.25 ± 1% +0.0% 198.25 ± 1% -93.9% 12.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.active_slabs
11102 ± 1% +0.0% 11102 ± 1% -95.8% 468.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.num_objs
198.25 ± 1% +0.0% 198.25 ± 1% -93.9% 12.00 ± 0% slabinfo.Acpi-ParseExt.num_slabs
341.25 ± 14% +2.9% 351.00 ± 11% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.blkdev_ioc.active_objs
341.25 ± 14% +2.9% 351.00 ± 11% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.blkdev_ioc.num_objs
438.00 ± 16% -8.3% 401.50 ± 20% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.file_lock_ctx.active_objs
438.00 ± 16% -8.3% 401.50 ± 20% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.file_lock_ctx.num_objs
4398 ± 1% +1.4% 4462 ± 0% -14.5% 3761 ± 2% slabinfo.ftrace_event_field.active_objs
4398 ± 1% +1.4% 4462 ± 0% -14.5% 3761 ± 2% slabinfo.ftrace_event_field.num_objs
3947 ± 2% +10.6% 4363 ± 3% +107.1% 8175 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_objs
93.00 ± 2% +10.8% 103.00 ± 3% +120.2% 204.75 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_slabs
3947 ± 2% +10.6% 4363 ± 3% +118.4% 8620 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_objs
93.00 ± 2% +10.8% 103.00 ± 3% +120.2% 204.75 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_slabs
1794 ± 0% +3.2% 1851 ± 2% +12.2% 2012 ± 3% slabinfo.trace_event_file.active_objs
1794 ± 0% +3.2% 1851 ± 2% +12.2% 2012 ± 3% slabinfo.trace_event_file.num_objs
7065 ± 7% -5.4% 6684 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.active_objs
160.50 ± 7% -5.5% 151.75 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.active_slabs
7091 ± 7% -5.6% 6694 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.num_objs
160.50 ± 7% -5.5% 151.75 ± 8% -100.0% 0.00 ± -1% slabinfo.vm_area_struct.num_slabs
857.50 ± 29% +75.7% 1506 ± 78% +157.6% 2209 ± 33% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.blocked_load_avg
52.75 ± 29% -29.4% 37.25 ± 60% +103.3% 107.25 ± 43% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.load
914.50 ± 29% +69.9% 1553 ± 77% +155.6% 2337 ± 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.tg_load_contrib
7.75 ± 34% -64.5% 2.75 ± 64% -12.9% 6.75 ±115% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.nr_spread_over
1135 ± 20% -43.6% 640.75 ± 49% -18.8% 922.50 ± 51% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.blocked_load_avg
1215 ± 21% -43.1% 691.50 ± 46% -21.3% 956.25 ± 50% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.tg_load_contrib
38.50 ± 21% +129.9% 88.50 ± 36% +96.1% 75.50 ± 56% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.load
26.00 ± 20% +98.1% 51.50 ± 46% +142.3% 63.00 ± 53% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.runnable_load_avg
128.25 ± 18% +227.5% 420.00 ± 43% +152.4% 323.75 ± 68% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.utilization_load_avg
28320 ± 12% -6.3% 26545 ± 11% -19.4% 22813 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
1015 ± 78% +101.1% 2042 ± 25% +64.4% 1669 ± 73% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
1069 ± 72% +100.2% 2140 ± 23% +61.2% 1722 ± 70% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
619.25 ± 12% -6.3% 580.25 ± 11% -19.2% 500.25 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
88.75 ± 14% -47.3% 46.75 ± 36% -24.5% 67.00 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.load
59.25 ± 23% -41.4% 34.75 ± 34% -6.3% 55.50 ± 12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.runnable_load_avg
315.50 ± 45% -64.6% 111.67 ± 1% -12.1% 277.25 ± 3% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.utilization_load_avg
2246758 ± 7% +87.6% 4213925 ± 65% -2.2% 2197475 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#0.nr_switches
2249376 ± 7% +87.4% 4215969 ± 65% -2.2% 2199216 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_count
1121438 ± 7% +81.0% 2030313 ± 61% -2.2% 1096479 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_goidle
1151160 ± 7% +86.5% 2146608 ± 64% -1.9% 1129264 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#0.ttwu_count
33.75 ± 15% -22.2% 26.25 ± 6% -8.9% 30.75 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#1.cpu_load[3]
33.25 ± 10% -18.0% 27.25 ± 7% -3.8% 32.00 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#1.cpu_load[4]
41.75 ± 29% +23.4% 51.50 ± 33% +53.9% 64.25 ± 16% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[1]
40.00 ± 18% +24.4% 49.75 ± 18% +49.4% 59.75 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[2]
39.25 ± 14% +22.3% 48.00 ± 10% +38.9% 54.50 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[3]
39.50 ± 15% +20.3% 47.50 ± 6% +30.4% 51.50 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#10.cpu_load[4]
5269004 ± 1% +27.8% 6731790 ± 30% +1.4% 5342560 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#10.nr_switches
5273193 ± 1% +27.8% 6736526 ± 30% +1.4% 5345791 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#10.sched_count
2633974 ± 1% +27.8% 3365271 ± 30% +1.4% 2670901 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#10.sched_goidle
2644149 ± 1% +26.9% 3356318 ± 30% +1.9% 2693295 ± 1% sched_debug.cpu#10.ttwu_count
26.50 ± 37% +116.0% 57.25 ± 48% +109.4% 55.50 ± 29% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[0]
30.75 ± 15% +66.7% 51.25 ± 31% +65.9% 51.00 ± 21% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[1]
33.50 ± 10% +37.3% 46.00 ± 22% +39.6% 46.75 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[2]
37.00 ± 11% +15.5% 42.75 ± 19% +29.7% 48.00 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load[4]
508300 ± 11% -0.6% 505024 ± 1% +18.1% 600291 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#4.avg_idle
454696 ± 9% -5.9% 427894 ± 25% +21.8% 553608 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#5.avg_idle
66.00 ± 27% +11.0% 73.25 ± 37% -46.6% 35.25 ± 22% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[0]
62.00 ± 36% +12.5% 69.75 ± 45% -41.5% 36.25 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[1]
247681 ± 19% +21.0% 299747 ± 10% +28.7% 318764 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#8.avg_idle
5116609 ± 4% +34.5% 6884238 ± 33% +55.2% 7942254 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.nr_switches
5120531 ± 4% +34.5% 6889156 ± 33% +55.2% 7945270 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.sched_count
2557822 ± 4% +34.5% 3441428 ± 33% +55.2% 3970337 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.sched_goidle
2565307 ± 4% +32.9% 3410042 ± 33% +54.0% 3949696 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#9.ttwu_count
0.00 ±141% +4.2e+05% 4.76 ±173% +47.7% 0.00 ±-59671% sched_debug.rt_rq[10]:/.rt_time
155259 ± 0% +0.0% 155259 ± 0% -42.2% 89723 ± 0% sched_debug.sysctl_sched.sysctl_sched_features
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-01 5:17 [x86/build] b2c51106c75: -18.1% will-it-scale.per_process_ops kernel test robot
2015-08-01 5:17 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2015-08-05 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-05 8:38 ` [lkp] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-10 20:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-10 20:39 ` [lkp] " Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 2:40 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2015-09-02 2:40 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1441161631.3138.7.camel@intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.