From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>
Cc: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>,
Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>,
Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Firmware Maintainers <linux-firmware@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] scsi: qla2xxx: Hide unavailable firmware
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:17:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444321066.2312.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D23B3DD9.BA955%himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 15:46 +0000, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
>
> On 10/7/15, 4:41 PM, "Julian Calaby" <julian.calaby@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Xose,
> >
> >On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez
> ><xose.vazquez@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Julian Calaby
> >><julian.calaby@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Some qla2xxx devices have firmware stored in flash on the device,
> >>> however for debugging and triage purposes, Qlogic staff like to
> >>> be able to load known-good versions of these firmwares through
> >>> request_firmware().
> >>>
> >>> These firmware files were never distributed and are unlikely to ever
> >>> be released publically, so to hide these missing firmware files from
> >>> scripts which check such things, (e.g. Debian's initramfs-tools) put
> >>> them behind a new EXPERT Kconfig option.
> >>
> >>
> >> What is state of this patch ?
> >
> >Apparently nobody cared, either from qLogic or linux-scsi.
> >
> >I'm not overly fussed whether it goes in or not, it was more a point
> >in the discussion that proceeded it, however it does solve the
> >problems in the discussion that preceded it.
>
> This patch Looks good.
>
> Acked-By: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>
Actually, this isn't helpful. You now add another option over which the
distributions have to make a choice. Is this interface necessary and
useful? If yes, then it should be compiled in and if not, just remove
it ... don't do death by 1000 Kconfig options.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 0:00 [PATCH for-next] scsi: qla2xxx: Hide unavailable firmware Julian Calaby
2015-05-22 0:05 ` Julian Calaby
2015-10-07 15:13 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2015-10-07 23:41 ` Julian Calaby
2015-10-08 15:46 ` Himanshu Madhani
2015-10-08 16:17 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2015-10-08 17:38 ` Himanshu Madhani
2015-10-08 23:10 ` Julian Calaby
2015-10-09 0:26 ` Giridhar Malavali
2015-10-09 14:45 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444321066.2312.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com \
--cc=julian.calaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-firmware@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com \
--cc=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.