All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>, anton@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] selftests/powerpc: Test preservation of FPU and VMX regs across preemption
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:34:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448238870.3483.107.camel@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447817215-15804-3-git-send-email-cyrilbur@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 14:26 +1100, Cyril Bur wrote:

> Loop in assembly checking the registers with many threads.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/Makefile      |  7 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_asm.S     | 34 ++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_preempt.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++=
++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_asm.S     | 44 ++++++++++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_preempt.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++=
++++++
>  5 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_preempt.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_preempt.c
>=20
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/Makefile
b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/Makefile
> index 896d9e2..9fa690f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/Makefile
> @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
> -TEST_PROGS :=3D fpu_syscall vmx_syscall
> +TEST_PROGS :=3D fpu_syscall fpu_preempt vmx_syscall vmx_preempt

.gitignore for this new build object


>  all: $(TEST_PROGS)
> =20
>  $(TEST_PROGS): ../harness.c
> -$(TEST_PROGS): CFLAGS +=3D -O2 -g
> +$(TEST_PROGS): CFLAGS +=3D -O2 -g -pthread
> =20
>  fpu_syscall: fpu_asm.S
> +fpu_preempt: fpu_asm.S
> +
>  vmx_syscall: vmx_asm.S
> +vmx_preempt: vmx_asm.S
> =20
>  include ../../lib.mk
> =20
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_asm.S b/tools/testi=
ng/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_asm.S
> index d5412c1..5ff0adc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_asm.S
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_asm.S
> @@ -149,3 +149,37 @@ FUNC_START(test_fpu)
>  > 	> POP_BASIC_STACK(256)
>  > 	> blr
>  FUNC_END(test_fpu)
> +
> +#int preempt_fpu(double *darray, volatile int *not_ready, int *sentinal)
> +#On starting will (atomically) decrement not_ready as a signal that the =
FPU
> +#has been loaded with darray. Will proceed to check the validity of the =
FPU
> +#registers while sentinal is not zero.
> +FUNC_START(preempt_fpu)
> +> 	> PUSH_BASIC_STACK(256)
> +> 	> std r3,32(sp) #double *darray
> +> 	> std r4,40(sp) #volatile int *not_ready
> +> 	> std r5,48(sp) #int *sentinal
> +> 	> PUSH_FPU(56)
> +
> +> 	> bl load_fpu
> +

Memory barrier here.

> +> 	> #Atomic DEC
> +> 	> ld r3,40(sp)
> +1:> 	> lwarx r4,0,r3
> +> 	> addi r4,r4,-1
> +> 	> stwcx. r4,0,r3
> +> 	> bne- 1b
> +
> +2:> 	> ld r3, 32(sp)
> +> 	> bl check_fpu
> +> 	> cmpdi r3,0
> +> 	> bne 3f
> +> 	> ld r4, 48(sp)
> +> 	> ld r5, 0(r4)
> +> 	> cmpwi r5,0
> +> 	> bne 2b
> +
> +3:> 	> POP_FPU(56)
> +> 	> POP_BASIC_STACK(256)
> +> 	> blr
> +FUNC_END(preempt_fpu)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_preempt.c b/tools/t=
esting/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_preempt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e24cf9b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_preempt.c

Needs a copyright and a description of the test here.

Same in patch 1.

> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/time.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +
> +#include "utils.h"
> +
> +/* Time to wait for workers to get preempted (seconds) */
> +#define PREEMPT_TIME 20
> +/*
> + * Factor by which to multiply number of online CPUs for total number of
> + * worker threads
> + */
> +#define THREAD_FACTOR 8
> +
> +
> +__thread double darray[] =3D {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.=
9, 1.0,
> +> 	> 	>      1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0,
> +> 	> 	>      2.1};
> +
> +volatile int not_ready;
> +int running;
> +
> +extern void preempt_fpu(double *darray, volatile int *not_ready, int *se=
ntinal);
> +
> +void *preempt_fpu_c(void *p)
> +{
> +> 	> int i;
> +> 	> srand(pthread_self());
> +> 	> for (i =3D 0; i < 21; i++)
> +> 	> 	> darray[i] =3D rand();
> +
> +> 	> /* Test failed if it ever returns */
> +> 	> preempt_fpu(darray, &not_ready, &running);
> +
> +> 	> return p;
> +}
> +
> +int test_preempt_fpu(void)
> +{
> +> 	> int i, rc, threads;
> +> 	> pthread_t *tids;
> +
> +> 	> threads =3D sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) * THREAD_FACTOR;
> +> 	> tids =3D malloc((threads) * sizeof(pthread_t));
> +> 	> FAIL_IF(!tids);
> +
> +> 	> running =3D true;
> +> 	> not_ready =3D threads;
> +> 	> for (i =3D 0; i < threads; i++) {
> +> 	> 	> rc =3D pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, preempt_fpu_c, NULL);
> +> 	> 	> FAIL_IF(rc);
> +> 	> }
> +
> +> 	> setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> +> 	> /* Not really nessesary but nice to wait for every thread to start =
*/
> +> 	> printf("\tWaiting for all workers to start...");
> +> 	> while(not_ready);

You need a memory barrier here and a matching one in the asm which is
derementing it.  Same in the VSX test.

> +> 	> printf("done\n");
> +
> +> 	> printf("\tWaiting for %d seconds to let some workers get preempted.=
..", PREEMPT_TIME);
> +> 	> sleep(PREEMPT_TIME);
> +> 	> printf("done\n");
> +
> +> 	> printf("\tKilling workers...");
> +> 	> running =3D 0;
> +> 	> for (i =3D 0; i < threads; i++) {
> +> 	> 	> void *rc_p;
> +> 	> 	> pthread_join(tids[i], &rc_p);
> +
> +> 	> 	> /*
> +> 	> 	>  * Harness will say the fail was here, look at why preempt_fpu
> +> 	> 	>  * returned
> +> 	> 	>  */
> +> 	> 	> if ((long) rc_p)
> +> 	> 	> 	> printf("oops\n");
> +> 	> 	> FAIL_IF((long) rc_p);
> +> 	> }
> +> 	> printf("done\n");
> +
> +> 	> free(tids);
> +> 	> return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +> 	> return test_harness(test_preempt_fpu, "fpu_preempt");
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_asm.S b/tools/testi=
ng/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_asm.S
> index e642e67..23db4b3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_asm.S
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_asm.S
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  #include "basic_asm.h"
> =20
> +#POS MUST BE 16 ALIGNED!
>  #define PUSH_VMX(pos,reg) \
>  > 	> li> 	> reg,pos; \
>  > 	> stvx> 	> v20,reg,sp; \
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@
>  > 	> addi> 	> reg,reg,16; \
>  > 	> stvx> 	> v31,reg,sp;
> =20
> +#POS MUST BE 16 ALIGNED!
>  #define POP_VMX(pos,reg) \
>  > 	> li> 	> reg,pos; \
>  > 	> lvx> 	> v20,reg,sp; \
> @@ -84,7 +86,7 @@ FUNC_END(load_vmx)
> =20
>  #Should be safe from C, only touches r4, r5 and v0,v1,v2
>  FUNC_START(check_vmx)
> -> 	> PUSH_BASIC_STACK(16)
> +> 	> PUSH_BASIC_STACK(32)
>  > 	> mr r4,r3
>  > 	> li> 	> r3,1 #assume a bad result
>  > 	> li> 	> r5,0
> @@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ FUNC_START(check_vmx)
>  > 	> cmpdi> 	> r0,0xffffffff
>  > 	> bne> 	> 1f
>  > 	> li> 	> r3,0
> -1:> 	> POP_BASIC_STACK(16)
> +1:> 	> POP_BASIC_STACK(32)
>  > 	> blr
>  FUNC_END(check_vmx)
> =20
> @@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ FUNC_START(test_vmx)
>  > 	> PUSH_BASIC_STACK(512)
>  > 	> std> 	> r3,40(sp) #Address of varray
>  > 	> std r4,48(sp) #address of pid
> -> 	> PUSH_VMX(56, r4)
> +> 	> PUSH_VMX(64, r4)
> =20
>  > 	> bl load_vmx
> =20
> @@ -177,7 +179,41 @@ FUNC_START(test_vmx)
>  > 	> ld r3,40(sp)
>  > 	> bl check_vmx
> =20
> -> 	> POP_VMX(56,r4)
> +> 	> POP_VMX(64,r4)
>  > 	> POP_BASIC_STACK(512)
>  > 	> blr
>  FUNC_END(test_vmx)
> +
> +#int preempt_vmx(v4si *varray, volatile int *not_ready, int *sentinal)
> +#On starting will (atomically) decrement not_ready as a signal that the =
FPU
> +#has been loaded with varray. Will proceed to check the validity of the =
FPU
> +#registers while sentinal is not zero.
> +FUNC_START(preempt_vmx)
> +> 	> PUSH_BASIC_STACK(512)
> +> 	> std r3,32(sp) #v4si *varray
> +> 	> std r4,40(sp) #volatile int *not_ready
> +> 	> std r5,48(sp) #int *sentinal
> +> 	> PUSH_VMX(64,r4)
> +
> +> 	> bl load_vmx
> +

Memory barrier here

> +> 	> #Atomic DEC
> +> 	> ld r3,40(sp)
> +1:> 	> lwarx r4,0,r3
> +> 	> addi r4,r4,-1
> +> 	> stwcx. r4,0,r3
> +> 	> bne- 1b
> +
> +2:> 	> ld r3,32(sp)
> +> 	> bl check_vmx
> +> 	> cmpdi r3,0
> +> 	> bne 3f
> +> 	> ld r4,48(sp)
> +> 	> ld r5,0(r4)
> +> 	> cmpwi r5,0
> +> 	> bne 2b
> +
> +3:> 	> POP_VMX(64,r4)
> +> 	> POP_BASIC_STACK(512)
> +> 	> blr
> +FUNC_END(preempt_vmx)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_preempt.c b/tools/t=
esting/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_preempt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..342db15
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/vmx_preempt.c

Needs a copyright and a description of the test here. =20

> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/time.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +
> +#include "utils.h"
> +
> +/* Time to wait for workers to get preempted (seconds) */
> +#define PREEMPT_TIME 20
> +/*
> + * Factor by which to multiply number of online CPUs for total number of
> + * worker threads
> + */
> +#define THREAD_FACTOR 8
> +
> +typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
> +__thread v4si varray[] =3D {{1, 2, 3, 4}, {5, 6, 7, 8}, {9, 10,11,12},
> +> 	> {13,14,15,16},{17,18,19,20},{21,22,23,24},
> +> 	> {25,26,27,28},{29,30,31,32},{33,34,35,36},
> +> 	> {37,38,39,40},{41,42,43,44},{45,46,47,48}};
> +
> +volatile int not_ready;

I really hate this name.  How about just "ready" and you negate the
code.

> +int running;

Now about not_running ;-P

> +
> +extern void preempt_vmx(v4si *varray, volatile int *not_ready, int *sent=
inal);
> +
> +void *preempt_vmx_c(void *p)
> +{
> +> 	> int i, j;
> +> 	> srand(pthread_self());
> +> 	> for (i =3D 0; i < 12; i++)
> +> 	> 	> for (j =3D 0; j < 4; j++)
> +> 	> 	> 	> varray[i][j] =3D rand();
> +
> +> 	> /* Test fails if it ever returns */
> +> 	> preempt_vmx(varray, &not_ready, &running);
> +> 	> return p;
> +}
> +
> +int test_preempt_vmx(void)
> +{
> +> 	> int i, rc, threads;
> +> 	> pthread_t *tids;
> +
> +> 	> threads =3D sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) * THREAD_FACTOR;
> +> 	> tids =3D malloc(threads * sizeof(pthread_t));
> +> 	> FAIL_IF(!tids);
> +
> +> 	> running =3D true;
> +> 	> not_ready =3D threads;
> +> 	> for (i =3D 0; i < threads; i++) {
> +> 	> 	> rc =3D pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, preempt_vmx_c, NULL);
> +> 	> 	> FAIL_IF(rc);
> +> 	> }
> +
> +> 	> setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> +> 	> /* Not really nessesary but nice to wait for every thread to start =
*/
> +> 	> printf("\tWaiting for all workers to start...");
> +> 	> while(not_ready);

Again, a memory barrier here.

> +> 	> printf("done\n");
> +
> +> 	> printf("\tWaiting for %d seconds to let some workers get preempted.=
..", PREEMPT_TIME);
> +> 	> sleep(PREEMPT_TIME);
> +> 	> printf("done\n");
> +
> +> 	> printf("\tKilling workers...");
> +> 	> running =3D 0;
> +> 	> for (i =3D 0; i < threads; i++) {
> +> 	> 	> void *rc_p;
> +> 	> 	> pthread_join(tids[i], &rc_p);
> +
> +> 	> 	> /*
> +> 	> 	>  * Harness will say the fail was here, look at why preempt_vmx
> +> 	> 	>  * returned
> +> 	> 	>  */
> +> 	> 	> if ((long) rc_p)
> +> 	> 	> 	> printf("oops\n");
> +> 	> 	> FAIL_IF((long) rc_p);
> +> 	> }
> +> 	> printf("done\n");
> +
> +> 	> return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +> 	> return test_harness(test_preempt_vmx, "vmx_preempt");
> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-23  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18  3:26 [PATCH 0/8] FP/VEC/VSX switching optimisations Cyril Bur
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] selftests/powerpc: Test the preservation of FPU and VMX regs across syscall Cyril Bur
2015-11-23  0:23   ` Michael Neuling
2015-11-23  0:58     ` Cyril Bur
2015-11-23  1:06       ` Michael Neuling
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] selftests/powerpc: Test preservation of FPU and VMX regs across preemption Cyril Bur
2015-11-23  0:34   ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] selftests/powerpc: Test FPU and VMX regs in signal ucontext Cyril Bur
2015-11-19 11:36   ` [3/8] " Michael Ellerman
2015-11-23  1:04   ` [PATCH 3/8] " Michael Neuling
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc: Explicitly disable math features when copying thread Cyril Bur
2015-11-23  1:08   ` Michael Neuling
2015-11-23  3:20     ` Cyril Bur
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc: Restore FPU/VEC/VSX if previously used Cyril Bur
2015-11-20 11:01   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-22 22:18     ` Cyril Bur
2015-11-22 23:07       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-23  1:29   ` Michael Neuling
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc: Add the ability to save FPU without giving it up Cyril Bur
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc: Add the ability to save Altivec " Cyril Bur
2015-11-18  3:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc: Add the ability to save VSX " Cyril Bur
2015-11-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] FP/VEC/VSX switching optimisations David Laight
2015-11-18 23:01   ` Cyril Bur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1448238870.3483.107.camel@neuling.org \
    --to=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.