From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: shall distros run btrfsck on boot?
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:43:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448340211.14125.44.camel@scientia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$32768$921cbe34$6a22269c$2c7db710@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1243 bytes --]
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 04:35 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> I'm a list regular and btrfs user, not a dev, but all the indications
> continue to point to _not_ running it automatically at boot, nobody
> even
> _suggesting_ otherwise.
Sure, I just asked because maybe that would have just been an
anachronism from the days btrfsck was much more alpha.
> The btrfs kernel code itself detects and often
> corrects many problems, and btrfs check is simply not recommended for
> automatic at-boot scheduling -- if the kernel code can't fix it
> without
> intervention, then the problem is too serious to be fixed without
> intervention by some scheduled btrfs check run, as well.
I once had an issue with a btrfs, where the kernel didn't show anything
but btrfsck did...(not the one Qu's currently looking into).
And I though the same is basically the case for other filesystems like
ext.
> In fact, take a look at the shipped fsck.btrfs shell-script, based
> upon
> the xfs one. As both the code and the comments suggest, it's
> specifically designed to simply return success
Sure, but that could have simply been forgotten to update...
Thanks for the update on the status in that matter :)
Cheers,
Chris.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5313 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 4:02 shall distros run btrfsck on boot? Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-24 4:31 ` Wang Shilong
2015-11-24 4:35 ` Duncan
2015-11-24 4:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-11-24 4:43 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer [this message]
2015-11-24 5:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-24 6:46 ` Duncan
2015-11-24 6:56 ` Duncan
2015-11-24 17:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-11-24 17:23 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-24 20:38 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-24 22:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-11-24 22:33 ` Hugo Mills
2015-11-24 23:01 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-24 23:06 ` Hugo Mills
2015-11-25 1:59 ` shall distros run btrfsck on boot?(Off topic, btrfs per-inode tree idea) Qu Wenruo
2015-11-25 12:32 ` shall distros run btrfsck on boot? Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-25 15:26 ` Martin Steigerwald
2015-11-28 16:52 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-11-30 1:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-30 19:27 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-11-30 15:06 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448340211.14125.44.camel@scientia.net \
--to=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.