Toaster, buildstats and build history

Toaster, buildstats and build history

[Barros Pena, Belen]

There seems to be a fair bit of work going on in build history, and also I
think in builstats. Toaster uses both, so I wonder:

1. Will the changes affect Toaster in any way?
2. Is any of the additions to build history providing extra information
that we should display in Toaster?

Cheers

Belén

On 27/11/2015 00:34, "openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org on
behalf of Paul Eggleton" <openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
on behalf of paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday 25 November 2015 10:30:28 Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> The initial implementation of YOCTO #8138
>> ("buildhistory-extra.bbclass: store more information about a build")
>> had some issues ("kconfig" file not preserved) but more importantly,
>> additional changes are needed to support also gathering information
>> about native recipes.
>> 
>> I am proposing to include only the "buildhistory.bbclass: support
>> extending the content of the build history" patch into OE-core.
>> 
>> The original buildhistory-extra.bbclass and the modifications made to
>> it are included here merely to provide the context for that change and
>> to publish the modifications.
>
>For others' reference, buildhistory-extra.bbclass was previously attached
>to 
>https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8138 - I didn't and
>wouldn't 
>propose introducing it into OE-Core in its current form because it's kind
>of 
>turning buildhistory into something it wasn't designed for, though I
>don't 
>disagree that it's useful. Happy to hear opinions from others on this
>though.
>
>One aspect that will probably change in the future is how it picks up the
>kernel configuration - for
>https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 (which I hope to
>get to 
>for 2.1, but no promises) we will need to write the kernel configuration
>to the 
>sysroot so that we have somewhere we can look for it; if that's the case
>there'll be no need to copy it specially in buildhistory-extra.bbclass.
>
>Cheers,
>Paul
>
>-- 
>
>Paul Eggleton
>Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>-- 
>_______________________________________________
>Openembedded-core mailing list
>Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: Toaster, buildstats and build history

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 11:03 +0000, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> There seems to be a fair bit of work going on in build history, and also I
> think in builstats. Toaster uses both, so I wonder:
> 
> 1. Will the changes affect Toaster in any way?
> 2. Is any of the additions to build history providing extra information
> that we should display in Toaster?

Specifically on buildstats, I am planning to change the file quite
significantly. I'm mostly removing data which is pretty broken so I'm
hopeful that toaster is only using the useful things and should be
unaffected. I'll try and see which data toaster is using and figure out
what (if anything) needs changing.

Cheers,

Richard

Re: Toaster, buildstats and build history

[Paul Eggleton]

Hi Belen,

On Friday 27 November 2015 11:03:45 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> On 27/11/2015 00:34, "openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org on
> behalf of Paul Eggleton" <openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
> on behalf of paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >On Wednesday 25 November 2015 10:30:28 Patrick Ohly wrote:
> >> The initial implementation of YOCTO #8138
> >> ("buildhistory-extra.bbclass: store more information about a build")
> >> had some issues ("kconfig" file not preserved) but more importantly,
> >> additional changes are needed to support also gathering information
> >> about native recipes.
> >> 
> >> I am proposing to include only the "buildhistory.bbclass: support
> >> extending the content of the build history" patch into OE-core.
> >> 
> >> The original buildhistory-extra.bbclass and the modifications made to
> >> it are included here merely to provide the context for that change and
> >> to publish the modifications.
> >
> >For others' reference, buildhistory-extra.bbclass was previously attached
> >to
> >https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8138 - I didn't and
> >wouldn't
> >propose introducing it into OE-Core in its current form because it's kind
> >of
> >turning buildhistory into something it wasn't designed for, though I
> >don't
> >disagree that it's useful. Happy to hear opinions from others on this
> >though.
> >
> >One aspect that will probably change in the future is how it picks up the
> >kernel configuration - for
> >https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 (which I hope to
> >get to
> >for 2.1, but no promises) we will need to write the kernel configuration
> >to the
> >sysroot so that we have somewhere we can look for it; if that's the case
> >there'll be no need to copy it specially in buildhistory-extra.bbclass.
>
> There seems to be a fair bit of work going on in build history, and also I
> think in builstats. Toaster uses both, so I wonder:
> 
> 1. Will the changes affect Toaster in any way?

As far as the discussion you're quoting above, no. As I mentioned, 
buildhistory-extra.bbclass isn't intended to go into OE-Core.

> 2. Is any of the additions to build history providing extra information
> that we should display in Toaster?

At the moment buildhistory isn't exposed in Toaster beyond how it's being used 
to get information on packages and image contents. Independent of the changes 
in the above quoted discussion, you could start exposing buildhistory in 
Toaster, but the problem is you need to choose which build to compare it to, 
or you'll just get the last build which may not make sense in a Toaster 
context.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: Toaster, buildstats and build history

[Barros Pena, Belen]

On 29/11/2015 21:33, "Paul Eggleton" <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>Hi Belen,
>
>On Friday 27 November 2015 11:03:45 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>> On 27/11/2015 00:34, "openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>>on
>> behalf of Paul Eggleton"
>><openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>> on behalf of paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >On Wednesday 25 November 2015 10:30:28 Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> >> The initial implementation of YOCTO #8138
>> >> ("buildhistory-extra.bbclass: store more information about a build")
>> >> had some issues ("kconfig" file not preserved) but more importantly,
>> >> additional changes are needed to support also gathering information
>> >> about native recipes.
>> >> 
>> >> I am proposing to include only the "buildhistory.bbclass: support
>> >> extending the content of the build history" patch into OE-core.
>> >> 
>> >> The original buildhistory-extra.bbclass and the modifications made to
>> >> it are included here merely to provide the context for that change
>>and
>> >> to publish the modifications.
>> >
>> >For others' reference, buildhistory-extra.bbclass was previously
>>attached
>> >to
>> >https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8138 - I didn't and
>> >wouldn't
>> >propose introducing it into OE-Core in its current form because it's
>>kind
>> >of
>> >turning buildhistory into something it wasn't designed for, though I
>> >don't
>> >disagree that it's useful. Happy to hear opinions from others on this
>> >though.
>> >
>> >One aspect that will probably change in the future is how it picks up
>>the
>> >kernel configuration - for
>> >https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 (which I hope to
>> >get to
>> >for 2.1, but no promises) we will need to write the kernel
>>configuration
>> >to the
>> >sysroot so that we have somewhere we can look for it; if that's the
>>case
>> >there'll be no need to copy it specially in buildhistory-extra.bbclass.
>>
>> There seems to be a fair bit of work going on in build history, and
>>also I
>> think in builstats. Toaster uses both, so I wonder:
>> 
>> 1. Will the changes affect Toaster in any way?
>
>As far as the discussion you're quoting above, no. As I mentioned,
>buildhistory-extra.bbclass isn't intended to go into OE-Core.
>
>> 2. Is any of the additions to build history providing extra information
>> that we should display in Toaster?
>
>At the moment buildhistory isn't exposed in Toaster beyond how it's being
>used 
>to get information on packages and image contents. Independent of the
>changes 
>in the above quoted discussion, you could start exposing buildhistory in
>Toaster, but the problem is you need to choose which build to compare it
>to,

We should really do this at some point. We've had a feature open in
Bugzilla for ages:

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6840

Cheers

Belén

> 
>or you'll just get the last build which may not make sense in a Toaster
>context.
>
>Cheers,
>Paul
>
>-- 
>
>Paul Eggleton
>Intel Open Source Technology Centre