All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam
	<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	Maoguang Meng
	<maoguang.meng-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin-8E1dMatC8ynQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Hongzhou Yang
	<hongzhou.yang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf-AgBVmzD5pcezQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM"
	<linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthias Brugger
	<matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
	<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:36:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450791416.20501.7.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbuL5Kjeqb-zJg9DmoxKzy7vphYgBTG-Ffh2i=UVH97ug-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 11:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find
> > their pctldev without probe deferring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I interpret the discussion as I should wait for a new version of this?
> 
> Or should it be applied?

We'll have another patch to change init orders for pwrap, mt6397 mfd
core and mt6397 regulator. Before that, the mt6397 pinctrl changes in
this patch won't work as expect. Apply this now won't cause any problem
either, unless someone think we should stink to current orders.

So I think we could apply this now:

Acked-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

Joe.C

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com (Yingjoe Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:36:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450791416.20501.7.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbuL5Kjeqb-zJg9DmoxKzy7vphYgBTG-Ffh2i=UVH97ug@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 11:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find
> > their pctldev without probe deferring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
> 
> I interpret the discussion as I should wait for a new version of this?
> 
> Or should it be applied?

We'll have another patch to change init orders for pwrap, mt6397 mfd
core and mt6397 regulator. Before that, the mt6397 pinctrl changes in
this patch won't work as expect. Apply this now won't cause any problem
either, unless someone think we should stink to current orders.

So I think we could apply this now:

Acked-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>

Joe.C

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
	Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>,
	"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	Maoguang Meng <maoguang.meng@mediatek.com>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
	"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:36:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450791416.20501.7.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbuL5Kjeqb-zJg9DmoxKzy7vphYgBTG-Ffh2i=UVH97ug@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 11:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find
> > their pctldev without probe deferring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
> 
> I interpret the discussion as I should wait for a new version of this?
> 
> Or should it be applied?

We'll have another patch to change init orders for pwrap, mt6397 mfd
core and mt6397 regulator. Before that, the mt6397 pinctrl changes in
this patch won't work as expect. Apply this now won't cause any problem
either, unless someone think we should stink to current orders.

So I think we could apply this now:

Acked-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>

Joe.C



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-18  4:21 [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-18  4:21 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-18  4:21 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-18 15:06 ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-12-18 15:06   ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-12-21  6:51   ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-21  6:51     ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-21  6:51     ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-21 12:39     ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-12-21 12:39       ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-12-21 12:45       ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-21 12:45         ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-22 10:23 ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-22 10:23   ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]   ` <CACRpkdbuL5Kjeqb-zJg9DmoxKzy7vphYgBTG-Ffh2i=UVH97ug-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-22 13:36     ` Yingjoe Chen [this message]
2015-12-22 13:36       ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-12-22 13:36       ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-12-22 13:41       ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-22 13:41         ` Daniel Kurtz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-22 13:46 Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-22 13:46 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-22 13:46 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-22 15:11 ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-22 15:11   ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-30 17:22   ` Mark Brown
2015-12-30 17:22     ` Mark Brown
2015-12-31 13:45     ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-31 13:45       ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-12-31 22:07       ` Mark Brown
2015-12-31 22:07         ` Mark Brown
     [not found]         ` <20151231220712.GD16023-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-01  1:56           ` Daniel Kurtz
2016-01-01  1:56             ` Daniel Kurtz
2016-01-01  1:56             ` Daniel Kurtz
2016-01-01 14:27             ` Matthias Brugger
2016-01-01 14:27               ` Matthias Brugger
2016-01-01 17:29               ` Linus Walleij
2016-01-01 17:29                 ` Linus Walleij
2016-01-04 17:12                 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-04 17:12                   ` Mark Brown
2016-01-04 18:23             ` Mark Brown
2016-01-04 18:23               ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450791416.20501.7.camel@mtksdaap41 \
    --to=yingjoe.chen-nus5lvnupcjwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=axel.lin-8E1dMatC8ynQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fabf-AgBVmzD5pcezQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hongzhou.yang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=maoguang.meng-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=patrice.chotard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.