From: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI presence check to intel_bios.c
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452775970.4104.29.camel@sorvi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47e27e26da28ad0f5e168c0f9c33f8188eada7ec.1452541881.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 21:54 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hide knowledge about VBT child devices in intel_bios.c.
>
Tested-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 6ae828f984de..f8516f564d0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1474,7 +1474,6 @@ struct intel_vbt_data {
>
> /* MIPI DSI */
> struct {
> - u16 port;
> u16 panel_id;
> struct mipi_config *config;
> struct mipi_pps_data *pps;
> @@ -3350,6 +3349,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size);
> bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin);
> bool intel_bios_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port);
> +bool intel_bios_is_dsi_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port *port);
>
> /* intel_opregion.c */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index a7491a450cc8..94c2baa50db7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1221,7 +1221,6 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> &&p_child->common.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_MIPI_OUTPUT) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Found MIPI as LFP\n");
> dev_priv->vbt.has_mipi = 1;
> - dev_priv->vbt.dsi.port = p_child->common.dvo_port;
> }
>
> child_dev_ptr = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + count;
> @@ -1536,3 +1535,35 @@ bool intel_bios_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_bios_is_dsi_present - is DSI present in VBT
> + * @dev_priv: i915 device instance
> + * @port: port for DSI if present
> + *
> + * Return true if DSI is present, and return the port in %port.
> + */
> +bool intel_bios_is_dsi_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + enum port *port)
> +{
> + union child_device_config *p_child;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
> + p_child = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
> +
> + if (!(p_child->common.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_MIPI_OUTPUT))
> + continue;
> +
> + switch (p_child->common.dvo_port) {
> + case DVO_PORT_MIPIA:
> + case DVO_PORT_MIPIB:
> + case DVO_PORT_MIPIC:
> + case DVO_PORT_MIPID:
> + *port = p_child->common.dvo_port - DVO_PORT_MIPIA;
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 91cef3525c93..33f219cfba43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -1112,9 +1112,15 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>
> /* There is no detection method for MIPI so rely on VBT */
> - if (!dev_priv->vbt.has_mipi)
> + if (!intel_bios_is_dsi_present(dev_priv, &port))
> return;
>
> + if (port != PORT_A && port != PORT_C) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("VBT has unsupported DSI port %c\n",
> + port_name(port));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) {
> dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base = VLV_MIPI_BASE;
> } else {
> @@ -1153,16 +1159,15 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> intel_connector->unregister = intel_connector_unregister;
>
> /* Pipe A maps to MIPI DSI port A, pipe B maps to MIPI DSI port C */
> - if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.port == DVO_PORT_MIPIA) {
> - intel_encoder->crtc_mask = (1 << PIPE_A);
> - intel_dsi->ports = (1 << PORT_A);
> - } else if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.port == DVO_PORT_MIPIC) {
> - intel_encoder->crtc_mask = (1 << PIPE_B);
> - intel_dsi->ports = (1 << PORT_C);
> - }
> + if (port == PORT_A)
> + intel_encoder->crtc_mask = 1 << PIPE_A;
> + else
> + intel_encoder->crtc_mask = 1 << PIPE_B;
>
> if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dual_link)
> - intel_dsi->ports = ((1 << PORT_A) | (1 << PORT_C));
> + intel_dsi->ports = (1 << PORT_A) | (1 << PORT_C);
> + else
> + intel_dsi->ports = 1 << port;
>
> /* Create a DSI host (and a device) for each port. */
> for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-11 19:54 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915: start hiding away vbt structure from the driver Jani Nikula
2016-01-11 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Jani Nikula
2016-01-12 9:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-14 12:51 ` Mika Kahola
2016-01-11 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: move VBT based LVDS " Jani Nikula
2016-01-14 12:52 ` Mika Kahola
2016-01-11 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915: move VBT based eDP port " Jani Nikula
2016-01-14 12:52 ` Mika Kahola
2016-01-11 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI presence " Jani Nikula
2016-01-14 12:52 ` Mika Kahola [this message]
2016-01-11 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/panel: setup pwm backlight based on connector type Jani Nikula
2016-01-11 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915: hide away VBT private data in a separate header Jani Nikula
2016-01-14 12:53 ` Mika Kahola
2016-01-11 20:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915: start hiding away vbt structure from the driver Lukas Wunner
2016-01-12 5:51 ` Jani Nikula
2016-01-12 8:20 ` ✓ success: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-09 15:29 [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Jani Nikula
2016-02-09 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452775970.4104.29.camel@sorvi \
--to=mika.kahola@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.