All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: netfront/netback multiqueue exhausting grants
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:37:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453372671.4320.4.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160121102537.GO1691@citrix.com>

On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:25 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:12:27AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [...]
> > > I've asked the reporter to send logs for the 4.4 case to xen-devel.
> > 
> > User confirmed[0] that 4.4 is actually OK.
> > 
> > Did someone request stable backports yet, or shall I do so?
> > 
> 
> I vaguely remember we requested backport for relevant patches long time
> ago, but I admit I have lost track. So it wouldn't hurt if you do it
> again.

So I think we'd be looking for:

32a8440 xen-netfront: respect user provided max_queues
4c82ac3 xen-netback: respect user provided max_queues
ca88ea1 xen-netfront: update num_queues to real created

which certainly resolves things such that the workarounds work, and I think
will also fix the default case such that it works with up to 32 vcpus
(although it will consume all the grants and only get 31/32 queues).

Does that sound correct?

As Annie said, we may still want to consider what a sensible default max
queues would be.

Ian.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-21 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 12:23 netfront/netback multiqueue exhausting grants Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 14:40 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-20 14:52   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 15:02     ` David Vrabel
2016-01-20 15:10       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-20 15:16         ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:12           ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:25             ` Wei Liu
2016-01-21 10:37               ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-01-21 10:52                 ` Wei Liu
2016-01-20 16:18 ` annie li
2016-01-21 10:56 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-21 12:19   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 14:17     ` David Vrabel
2016-01-21 15:11       ` annie li
2016-01-22  3:36     ` Bob Liu
2016-01-22  7:53       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 10:40         ` Bob Liu
2016-01-22 11:02           ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-23  0:29             ` Bob Liu
2016-01-25  9:53               ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453372671.4320.4.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.