All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: netfront/netback multiqueue exhausting grants
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:40:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A20716.9090607@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A1EE2102000078000C9E13@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>



On 01/22/2016 03:53 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.01.16 at 04:36, <bob.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>> By the way, do you think it's possible to make grant table support bigger 
>> page e.g 64K?
>> One grant-ref per 64KB instead of 4KB, this should able to reduce the grant 
>> entry consumption significantly.
> 
> How would that work with an underlying page size of 4k, and pages
> potentially being non-contiguous in machine address space? Besides
> that the grant table hypercall interface isn't prepared to support
> 64k page size, due to its use of uint16_t for the length of copy ops.
> 

Right, and I mean whether we should consider address all the place as your mentioned.
With multi-queue xen-block and xen-network, we got more reports that the grants were exhausted.

-- 
Regards,
-Bob

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-22 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 12:23 netfront/netback multiqueue exhausting grants Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 14:40 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-20 14:52   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 15:02     ` David Vrabel
2016-01-20 15:10       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-20 15:16         ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:12           ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:25             ` Wei Liu
2016-01-21 10:37               ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:52                 ` Wei Liu
2016-01-20 16:18 ` annie li
2016-01-21 10:56 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-21 12:19   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 14:17     ` David Vrabel
2016-01-21 15:11       ` annie li
2016-01-22  3:36     ` Bob Liu
2016-01-22  7:53       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 10:40         ` Bob Liu [this message]
2016-01-22 11:02           ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-23  0:29             ` Bob Liu
2016-01-25  9:53               ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A20716.9090607@oracle.com \
    --to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.