From: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, jikos@kernel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 04:11:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455221494-2915-1-git-send-email-even.xu@intel.com> (raw)
Current ISH driver only registers suspend/resume PM callbacks which don't
support hibernation (suspend to disk). Basically after hiberation, the ISH
can't resume properly and user may not see sensor events
(for example: screen rotation may not work).
User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following message
in log:
hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from ISHTP device
So this patch adds support for S4/hiberbation to ISH by using the
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly. The suspend
and resume functions will now be used for both suspend to RAM and hibernation.
If power management is disabled, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do nothing, the suspend
and resume related functions won't be used, so mark them as __maybe_unused to
clarify that this is the intended behavior, and remove #ifdefs for power
management.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c | 22 +++++++---------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
index 582e449..a2c53ea 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
@@ -205,8 +205,7 @@ static void ish_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
kfree(ishtp_dev);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-static struct device *ish_resume_device;
+static struct device __maybe_unused *ish_resume_device;
/* 50ms to get resume response */
#define WAIT_FOR_RESUME_ACK_MS 50
@@ -220,7 +219,7 @@ static struct device *ish_resume_device;
* in that case a simple resume message is enough, others we need
* a reset sequence.
*/
-static void ish_resume_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+static void __maybe_unused ish_resume_handler(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ish_resume_device);
struct ishtp_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -262,7 +261,7 @@ static void ish_resume_handler(struct work_struct *work)
*
* Return: 0 to the pm core
*/
-static int ish_suspend(struct device *device)
+static int __maybe_unused ish_suspend(struct device *device)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
struct ishtp_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -288,7 +287,7 @@ static int ish_suspend(struct device *device)
return 0;
}
-static DECLARE_WORK(resume_work, ish_resume_handler);
+static __maybe_unused DECLARE_WORK(resume_work, ish_resume_handler);
/**
* ish_resume() - ISH resume callback
* @device: device pointer
@@ -297,7 +296,7 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(resume_work, ish_resume_handler);
*
* Return: 0 to the pm core
*/
-static int ish_resume(struct device *device)
+static int __maybe_unused ish_resume(struct device *device)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
struct ishtp_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -311,21 +310,14 @@ static int ish_resume(struct device *device)
return 0;
}
-static const struct dev_pm_ops ish_pm_ops = {
- .suspend = ish_suspend,
- .resume = ish_resume,
-};
-#define ISHTP_ISH_PM_OPS (&ish_pm_ops)
-#else
-#define ISHTP_ISH_PM_OPS NULL
-#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ish_pm_ops, ish_suspend, ish_resume);
static struct pci_driver ish_driver = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.id_table = ish_pci_tbl,
.probe = ish_probe,
.remove = ish_remove,
- .driver.pm = ISHTP_ISH_PM_OPS,
+ .driver.pm = &ish_pm_ops,
};
module_pci_driver(ish_driver);
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 20:11 Even Xu [this message]
2018-06-13 11:34 ` [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation Jiri Kosina
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-11 1:56 Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-12 14:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-06-12 15:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-12 15:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13 0:05 ` Xu, Even
2018-06-13 0:14 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13 0:04 ` Xu, Even
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455221494-2915-1-git-send-email-even.xu@intel.com \
--to=even.xu@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.