From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:30:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <634cd945beca786dc77876f71e39459cef6fbd75.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1806121651460.6203@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 16:53 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>
> > From: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
> >
> > Current ish driver only register resume/suspend PM callbacks which
> > don't support hibernation (suspend to disk). Now use the
> > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly.
> > The suspend and resume functions will now be used for both suspend
> > to RAM and hibernation.
> >
> > If power management is disable, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do nothing,
> > the suspend and resume related functions won't be used, so mark
> > them
> > as __maybe_unused to clarify that this is intended behavior, and
> > remove #ifdefs for power management.
>
> This describes details the patch does on code level, but what are the
> user
> observable effects? Hibernation resume doesn't fail any more?
> Hibernation
> is possible (and wasn't before)? Did kernel crash while trying to
> hibernate and this is the fix? Or ... ?
Even,
Can you add more details and resubmit ASAP?
Basically after hiberation, the ISH can't resume properly and user may
not see sensor events (for example: screen rotation may not work).
User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following
message in log:
hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from
ISHTP device
So this is adding support for S4/hiberbation to ISH.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Thanks,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, even.xu@intel.com
Cc: benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:30:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <634cd945beca786dc77876f71e39459cef6fbd75.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1806121651460.6203@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 16:53 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>
> > From: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
> >
> > Current ish driver only register resume/suspend PM callbacks which
> > don't support hibernation (suspend to disk). Now use the
> > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly.
> > The suspend and resume functions will now be used for both suspend
> > to RAM and hibernation.
> >
> > If power management is disable, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do nothing,
> > the suspend and resume related functions won't be used, so mark
> > them
> > as __maybe_unused to clarify that this is intended behavior, and
> > remove #ifdefs for power management.
>
> This describes details the patch does on code level, but what are the
> user
> observable effects? Hibernation resume doesn't fail any more?
> Hibernation
> is possible (and wasn't before)? Did kernel crash while trying to
> hibernate and this is the fix? Or ... ?
Even,
Can you add more details and resubmit ASAP?
Basically after hiberation, the ISH can't resume properly and user may
not see sensor events (for example: screen rotation may not work).
User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following
message in log:
hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from
ISHTP device
So this is adding support for S4/hiberbation to ISH.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Thanks,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-12 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-11 1:56 [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-12 14:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-06-12 15:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2018-06-12 15:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13 0:05 ` Xu, Even
2018-06-13 0:14 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13 0:04 ` Xu, Even
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-11 20:11 Even Xu
2018-06-13 11:34 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=634cd945beca786dc77876f71e39459cef6fbd75.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=even.xu@intel.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.