All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
To: Insu Yun <wuninsu@gmail.com>
Cc: nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com,
	praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com,
	sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com, abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Taesoo Kim <taesoo@gatech.edu>,
	Yeongjin Jang <yeongjin.jang@gatech.edu>,
	"Yun, Insu" <insu@gatech.edu>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion-mptbase: handle failed allocation for workqueue
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:52:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455655940.22112.429.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGoFzNfFtxHRYz_UF1qS-wWhwNapffBx9xrMA2Lu51FGeTmo7w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 13:33 -0500, Insu Yun wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com> wrote:
>         On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 21:50 -0500, Insu Yun wrote:
>         > the failure of ioc->reset_work_q is checked,
>         > but not ioc->fw_event_q.
>         >
>         > Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@gmail.com>
>         > ---
>         >  drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c | 7 +++++++
>         >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>         >
>         > diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>         b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>         > index 5dcc031..d4907a1 100644
>         > --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>         > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>         > @@ -1996,6 +1996,13 @@ mpt_attach(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>         const struct pci_device_id *id)
>         >       snprintf(ioc->fw_event_q_name, MPT_KOBJ_NAME_LEN,
>         "mpt/%d", ioc->id);
>         >       ioc->fw_event_q =
>         create_singlethread_workqueue(ioc->fw_event_q_name);
>         >
>         > +     if (!ioc->fw_event_q) {
>         > +             destroy_workqueue(ioc->reset_work_q);
>         > +             pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, ioc->bars);
>         > +             kfree(ioc);
>         > +             return -ENOMEM;
>         > +     }
>         > +
>         >       if ((r = mpt_do_ioc_recovery(ioc,
>         MPT_HOSTEVENT_IOC_BRINGUP,
>         >           CAN_SLEEP)) != 0){
>         >               printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "didn't initialize
>         properly! (%d)\n",
>         
>         This does not look correct to me.  The error path for the call
>         to
>         mpt_do_ioc_recovery() after create_singlethread_workqueue()
>         for
>         ioc->fw_event_q does other cleanup, including:
>         
>                         list_del(&ioc->list);
>                         if (ioc->alt_ioc)
>                                 ioc->alt_ioc->alt_ioc = NULL;
>                         iounmap(ioc->memmap);
>         
>         and
>         
>                         kfree(ioc);
>                         pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> 
> 
> Oh yes. Right. 
> I just copied from above error handling code.
> 
> 
>  
>         
>         Here I think you are kfree()ing ioc while it is still on the
>         &ioc_list,
>         which will cause a crash.
>         
>         Note to Avago:  this code could use a symbolic return code
>         identifier:
>         
>                         if (r != -5)
>                                 pci_release_selected_regions(pdev,
>         ioc->bars);
> 
> 
> What is -5? it seems strange for me.
> 
> Is it error code? then it is better to use macro.

The comments above mpt_do_ioc_recovery() say:

 *      Returns:                                                                                                                                                                                                   
 *               0 for success                                                                                                                                                                                     
 *              -1 if failed to get board READY                                                                                                                                                                    
 *              -2 if READY but IOCFacts Failed                                                                                                                                                                    
 *              -3 if READY but PrimeIOCFifos Failed                                                                                                                                                               
 *              -4 if READY but IOCInit Failed                                                                                                                                                                     
 *              -5 if failed to enable_device and/or request_selected_regions                                                                                                                                      
 *              -6 if failed to upload firmware

and yes, it would be better to use a macro (symbolic value) hence my
comment to Avago.                                                                                                                                                      
> 
> 
>         
>         In general, with sequential allocation of resources like this,
>         error
>         handling can be performed using a series of goto's to labels
>         at the
>         end of the function that release the resources in reverse
>         order.  This
>         avoids the duplication of code within the function, and
>         reduces the
>         chance for errors when the function is later modified.  See
>         init_sd
>         in drivers/scsi/sd.c for an example.
>         
>         Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
>         
>         
> 
> 
> Then in summary, after failing allocation, I need to call
> 
> 
> list_del(&ioc->list);
> if (ioc->alt_ioc)
>   ioc->alt_ioc->alt_ioc = NULL;
> iounmap(ioc->memmap);
> kfree(ioc);
> pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> 
> 
> right?

I think you also need this:

                if (r != -5)
                        pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, ioc->bars);

                destroy_workqueue(ioc->reset_work_q);
                ioc->reset_work_q = NULL;

prior to your kfree(ioc) call.

Alternatively it looks like the code to create the ioc->fw_event_q could
be moved up to be right after the code to create the ioc->reset_work_q,
that might simplify the code a little bit as the ioc has not been added
to the &ioc_list and pci_set_drvdata() has not yet been called.

Note however that a failed call to mpt_do_ioc_recovery() still needs to
perform all the recovery actions, including destroying both work queues,
so consider putting the error handling code at the end of the function
as I mentioned above.  Otherwise, you should add:

                destroy_workqueue(ioc->fw_event_q);
                ioc->fw_event_q = NULL;

prior to the call to destroy_workqueue(ioc->reset_work_q) in that path.

-Ewan

> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Insu Yun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-16  2:50 [PATCH] fusion-mptbase: handle failed allocation for workqueue Insu Yun
2016-02-16 18:18 ` Ewan Milne
     [not found]   ` <CAGoFzNfFtxHRYz_UF1qS-wWhwNapffBx9xrMA2Lu51FGeTmo7w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-16 20:52     ` Ewan Milne [this message]
2016-02-17 16:53       ` Tomas Henzl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1455655940.22112.429.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com \
    --cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
    --cc=changwoo@gatech.edu \
    --cc=insu@gatech.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
    --cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=taesoo@gatech.edu \
    --cc=wuninsu@gmail.com \
    --cc=yeongjin.jang@gatech.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.