All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
To: emilne@redhat.com, Insu Yun <wuninsu@gmail.com>
Cc: nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com,
	praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com,
	sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com, abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Taesoo Kim <taesoo@gatech.edu>,
	Yeongjin Jang <yeongjin.jang@gatech.edu>,
	"Yun, Insu" <insu@gatech.edu>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion-mptbase: handle failed allocation for workqueue
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:53:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C4A5A2.4010008@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455655940.22112.429.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 16.2.2016 21:52, Ewan Milne wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 13:33 -0500, Insu Yun wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com> wrote:
>>         On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 21:50 -0500, Insu Yun wrote:
>>         > the failure of ioc->reset_work_q is checked,
>>         > but not ioc->fw_event_q.
>>         >
>>         > Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@gmail.com>
>>         > ---
>>         >  drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c | 7 +++++++
>>         >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>         >
>>         > diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>>         b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>>         > index 5dcc031..d4907a1 100644
>>         > --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>>         > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
>>         > @@ -1996,6 +1996,13 @@ mpt_attach(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>         const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>         >       snprintf(ioc->fw_event_q_name, MPT_KOBJ_NAME_LEN,
>>         "mpt/%d", ioc->id);
>>         >       ioc->fw_event_q =
>>         create_singlethread_workqueue(ioc->fw_event_q_name);
>>         >
>>         > +     if (!ioc->fw_event_q) {
>>         > +             destroy_workqueue(ioc->reset_work_q);
>>         > +             pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, ioc->bars);
>>         > +             kfree(ioc);
>>         > +             return -ENOMEM;
>>         > +     }
>>         > +
>>         >       if ((r = mpt_do_ioc_recovery(ioc,
>>         MPT_HOSTEVENT_IOC_BRINGUP,
>>         >           CAN_SLEEP)) != 0){
>>         >               printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "didn't initialize
>>         properly! (%d)\n",
>>         
>>         This does not look correct to me.  The error path for the call
>>         to
>>         mpt_do_ioc_recovery() after create_singlethread_workqueue()
>>         for
>>         ioc->fw_event_q does other cleanup, including:
>>         
>>                         list_del(&ioc->list);
>>                         if (ioc->alt_ioc)
>>                                 ioc->alt_ioc->alt_ioc = NULL;
>>                         iounmap(ioc->memmap);
>>         
>>         and
>>         
>>                         kfree(ioc);
>>                         pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>
>>
>> Oh yes. Right. 
>> I just copied from above error handling code.
>>
>>
>>  
>>         
>>         Here I think you are kfree()ing ioc while it is still on the
>>         &ioc_list,
>>         which will cause a crash.
>>         
>>         Note to Avago:  this code could use a symbolic return code
>>         identifier:
>>         
>>                         if (r != -5)
>>                                 pci_release_selected_regions(pdev,
>>         ioc->bars);
>>
>>
>> What is -5? it seems strange for me.
>>
>> Is it error code? then it is better to use macro.
> The comments above mpt_do_ioc_recovery() say:
>
>  *      Returns:                                                                                                                                                                                                   
>  *               0 for success                                                                                                                                                                                     
>  *              -1 if failed to get board READY                                                                                                                                                                    
>  *              -2 if READY but IOCFacts Failed                                                                                                                                                                    
>  *              -3 if READY but PrimeIOCFifos Failed                                                                                                                                                               
>  *              -4 if READY but IOCInit Failed                                                                                                                                                                     
>  *              -5 if failed to enable_device and/or request_selected_regions                                                                                                                                      
>  *              -6 if failed to upload firmware
>
> and yes, it would be better to use a macro (symbolic value) hence my
> comment to Avago.                                                                                                                                                      
>>
>>         
>>         In general, with sequential allocation of resources like this,
>>         error
>>         handling can be performed using a series of goto's to labels
>>         at the
>>         end of the function that release the resources in reverse
>>         order.  This
>>         avoids the duplication of code within the function, and
>>         reduces the
>>         chance for errors when the function is later modified.  See
>>         init_sd
>>         in drivers/scsi/sd.c for an example.
>>         
>>         Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
>>         
>>         
>>
>>
>> Then in summary, after failing allocation, I need to call
>>
>>
>> list_del(&ioc->list);
>> if (ioc->alt_ioc)
>>   ioc->alt_ioc->alt_ioc = NULL;
>> iounmap(ioc->memmap);
>> kfree(ioc);
>> pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);

After 0998d06310 "device-core: Ensure drvdata = NULL when no driver is bound"
the pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); is no more needed.

tomash

>>
>>
>> right?
> I think you also need this:
>
>                 if (r != -5)
>                         pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, ioc->bars);
>
>                 destroy_workqueue(ioc->reset_work_q);
>                 ioc->reset_work_q = NULL;
>
> prior to your kfree(ioc) call.
>
> Alternatively it looks like the code to create the ioc->fw_event_q could
> be moved up to be right after the code to create the ioc->reset_work_q,
> that might simplify the code a little bit as the ioc has not been added
> to the &ioc_list and pci_set_drvdata() has not yet been called.
>
> Note however that a failed call to mpt_do_ioc_recovery() still needs to
> perform all the recovery actions, including destroying both work queues,
> so consider putting the error handling code at the end of the function
> as I mentioned above.  Otherwise, you should add:
>
>                 destroy_workqueue(ioc->fw_event_q);
>                 ioc->fw_event_q = NULL;
>
> prior to the call to destroy_workqueue(ioc->reset_work_q) in that path.
>
> -Ewan
>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards
>> Insu Yun
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-17 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-16  2:50 [PATCH] fusion-mptbase: handle failed allocation for workqueue Insu Yun
2016-02-16 18:18 ` Ewan Milne
     [not found]   ` <CAGoFzNfFtxHRYz_UF1qS-wWhwNapffBx9xrMA2Lu51FGeTmo7w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-16 20:52     ` Ewan Milne
2016-02-17 16:53       ` Tomas Henzl [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C4A5A2.4010008@redhat.com \
    --to=thenzl@redhat.com \
    --cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com \
    --cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
    --cc=changwoo@gatech.edu \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=insu@gatech.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
    --cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=taesoo@gatech.edu \
    --cc=wuninsu@gmail.com \
    --cc=yeongjin.jang@gatech.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.