FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix enum ctl accesses in a wrong type" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix enum ctl accesses in a wrong type" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 15c665700bf6f4543f003ac0fbb1e9ec692e93f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:01:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix enum ctl accesses in a wrong type

The firmware ctls like "DSP1 Firmware" in wm_adsp codec driver are
enum, while the current driver accesses wrongly via
value.integer.value[].  They have to be via value.enumerated.item[]
instead.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
index 33806d487b8a..b9195b9c2b05 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int wm_adsp_fw_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
 	struct wm_adsp *dsp = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
 
-	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = dsp[e->shift_l].fw;
+	ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = dsp[e->shift_l].fw;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -599,10 +599,10 @@ static int wm_adsp_fw_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct wm_adsp *dsp = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] == dsp[e->shift_l].fw)
+	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] == dsp[e->shift_l].fw)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] >= WM_ADSP_NUM_FW)
+	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= WM_ADSP_NUM_FW)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dsp[e->shift_l].pwr_lock);
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static int wm_adsp_fw_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	if (dsp[e->shift_l].running || dsp[e->shift_l].compr)
 		ret = -EBUSY;
 	else
-		dsp[e->shift_l].fw = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
+		dsp[e->shift_l].fw = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dsp[e->shift_l].pwr_lock);