[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:25 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The clock and source clock looked up by the driver may not be available
> just because the clock controller driver was not probed yet so printing
> an error in this case is not correct and only adds confusion to users.
> 
> However, knowing that a driver's probe was deferred may be useful so it
> can be printed as debug information.

Hello again Javier:
> +			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe deferred due missing rtc clk\n");

Again, intelligible English would not use "due"
but would use "due to" or "because of".

> +				dev_dbg(&pdev->dev,
> +					"probe deferred due missing rtc src clk\n");

here too.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.