From: "Manoharan, Rajkumar" <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"rmanohar@codeaurora.org" <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ath10k: speedup htt rx descriptor processing for tx completion
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:52:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458834773112.89396@qti.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760wcdnws.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
[...]
>
>> @@ -1712,7 +1710,20 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_frm_tx_compl(struct ath10k *ar,
>> for (i = 0; i < resp->data_tx_completion.num_msdus; i++) {
>> msdu_id = resp->data_tx_completion.msdus[i];
>> tx_done.msdu_id = __le16_to_cpu(msdu_id);
>> - ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(htt, &tx_done);
>> +
>> + /* kfifo_put: In practice firmware shouldn't fire off per-CE
>> + * interrupt and main interrupt (MSI/-X range case) for the same
>> + * HTC service so it should be safe to use kfifo_put w/o lock.
>> + *
>> + * From kfifo_put() documentation:
>> + * Note that with only one concurrent reader and one concurrent
>> + * writer, you don't need extra locking to use these macro.
>> + */
>> + if (!kfifo_put(&htt->txdone_fifo, tx_done)) {
>> + ath10k_warn(ar, "txdone fifo overrun, msdu_id %d status %d\n",
>> + tx_done.msdu_id, tx_done.status);
>> + ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(htt, &tx_done);
>> + }
>
> I see two new warnings on the kfifo_put() call:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c:1722:22: warning: cast to non-scalar
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c:1722:22: warning: cast from non-scalar
>
> But I suspect they are false warnings due to my old compiler:
>
> gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
>
> Opinions?
>
Hmm... I am not sure why older compiler is not complaining this. Unfortunately
both x86 and cross compiler are not throwing any warnings though :(
gcc version 5.3.0 (GCC)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.8.3 (OpenWrt/Linaro GCC 4.8-2014.04 r47724)
Target: arm-openwrt-linux-uclibcgnueabi
Any suggestions welcome.
-Rajkumar
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Manoharan, Rajkumar" <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"rmanohar@codeaurora.org" <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ath10k: speedup htt rx descriptor processing for tx completion
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:52:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458834773112.89396@qti.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760wcdnws.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
[...]
>
>> @@ -1712,7 +1710,20 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_frm_tx_compl(struct ath10k *ar,
>> for (i = 0; i < resp->data_tx_completion.num_msdus; i++) {
>> msdu_id = resp->data_tx_completion.msdus[i];
>> tx_done.msdu_id = __le16_to_cpu(msdu_id);
>> - ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(htt, &tx_done);
>> +
>> + /* kfifo_put: In practice firmware shouldn't fire off per-CE
>> + * interrupt and main interrupt (MSI/-X range case) for the same
>> + * HTC service so it should be safe to use kfifo_put w/o lock.
>> + *
>> + * From kfifo_put() documentation:
>> + * Note that with only one concurrent reader and one concurrent
>> + * writer, you don't need extra locking to use these macro.
>> + */
>> + if (!kfifo_put(&htt->txdone_fifo, tx_done)) {
>> + ath10k_warn(ar, "txdone fifo overrun, msdu_id %d status %d\n",
>> + tx_done.msdu_id, tx_done.status);
>> + ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(htt, &tx_done);
>> + }
>
> I see two new warnings on the kfifo_put() call:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c:1722:22: warning: cast to non-scalar
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c:1722:22: warning: cast from non-scalar
>
> But I suspect they are false warnings due to my old compiler:
>
> gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
>
> Opinions?
>
Hmm... I am not sure why older compiler is not complaining this. Unfortunately
both x86 and cross compiler are not throwing any warnings though :(
gcc version 5.3.0 (GCC)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.8.3 (OpenWrt/Linaro GCC 4.8-2014.04 r47724)
Target: arm-openwrt-linux-uclibcgnueabi
Any suggestions welcome.
-Rajkumar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 11:52 [PATCH 0/9] ath10k: improve throughput performance Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] ath10k: speedup htt rx descriptor processing for tx completion Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-24 13:08 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-03-24 13:08 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-03-24 15:52 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar [this message]
2016-03-24 15:52 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2016-03-24 16:13 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2016-03-24 16:13 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2016-03-29 7:39 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-03-29 7:39 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-03-29 9:12 ` latest ath10k pending tree bug's Sebastian Gottschall
2016-03-29 11:02 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2016-03-29 16:02 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] ath10k: copy tx fetch indication message Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] ath10k: remove unused fw_desc processing Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] ath10k: cleanup amsdu processing for rx indication Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] ath10k: speedup htt rx descriptor processing for rx_ind Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] ath10k: register ath10k_htt_htc_t2h_msg_handler Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] ath10k: cleanup copy engine receive next completion Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] ath10k: reuse copy engine 5 (htt rx) descriptors Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] ath10k: combine txrx and replenish task Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-22 11:52 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-04-04 14:55 ` [PATCH 0/9] ath10k: improve throughput performance Valo, Kalle
2016-04-04 14:55 ` Valo, Kalle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458834773112.89396@qti.qualcomm.com \
--to=rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.