From: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched: tweak select_idle_sibling to look for idle threads
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 12:04:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460282661.4251.44.camel@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160409190554.honue3gtian2p6vr@floor.thefacebook.com>
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 15:05 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> This does preserve the existing logic to prefer idle cores over idle
> CPU threads, and includes some tests to try and avoid the idle scan when we're
> actually better off sharing a non-idle CPU with someone else.
My box says the "oh nevermind" checks aren't selective enough, tbench
dropped 4% at clients=cores, and 2% at clients=threads.
> Benchmarks in production show overall capacity going up between 2-5%
> depending on the metric.
Latency rules all loads certainly exist, and clearly want some love,
but the bigger the socket, and the more threads/core, the more that
traverse is gonna hurt the others, so seems either we need a better
filter, or a (yeah yeah, yet another damn) tweakable.
Oh, and bounce_to_target() seems an odd way to say full_traverse.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-10 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 18:08 [PATCH RFC] select_idle_sibling experiments Chris Mason
2016-04-05 18:43 ` Bastien Bastien Philbert
2016-04-05 19:28 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-05 20:03 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-05 21:05 ` Bastien Philbert
2016-04-06 0:44 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-06 7:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-06 13:36 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-09 17:30 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-12 21:45 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-13 3:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-13 15:54 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-28 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 13:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-02 5:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-07 15:17 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-09 19:05 ` sched: tweak select_idle_sibling to look for idle threads Chris Mason
2016-04-10 10:04 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2016-04-10 12:35 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-10 12:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-10 19:55 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-11 4:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-12 0:30 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-12 4:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-12 13:27 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-12 18:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-12 20:07 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-13 3:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-13 13:44 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-13 14:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-13 14:36 ` Chris Mason
2016-04-13 15:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-13 15:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-04-30 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-01 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-01 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-01 9:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-07 1:24 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-08 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-08 18:57 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-09 3:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-08 20:22 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-09 7:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-09 1:13 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-09 9:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-09 23:26 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-10 7:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-10 15:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-10 19:16 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-11 4:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-11 1:23 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-11 9:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-18 6:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-09 3:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-08 20:31 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-02 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 14:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-02 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 15:47 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-03 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-03 15:11 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-04 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-04 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-05 22:03 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-06 18:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-09 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 8:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-04 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-04 17:46 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-05 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-05 13:58 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-06 7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-06 17:27 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-06 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 17:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-02 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 16:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-05-03 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-03 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460282661.4251.44.camel@suse.de \
--to=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.